About Me

My photo
LONDON, CITY OF LONDON, United Kingdom
A SERVANT OF GOD, I THIRST FOR THE TRUTH THAT CHRISTENDOM HAS BURIED UNDER THE EARTH.

Monday 2 January 2012


DOCTRINE OF TRINITY EXPOSED! (updated!!!)
By O. Khodjo
Welcome to mis-translations and mis-interpretations
El is the singular form of the word God, when -im  is added e.g. Elohim, it is made plural. When used to refer to God Almighty, Elohim is similar to a uniplural noun. A uniplural noun can be used to indicate an object in the singular or plural sense. Example: The word sheep can be used to describe one sheep or many sheep. Example: Deer. One deer was at the lake. Many deer are in the woods. Even though Elohim is the plural form of the word, it is ALWAYS translated in the singular form when used in reference to the one true God.


There are times when elohim is translated in the plural sense when referring to pagan gods, but it is also translated singularly to describe a pagan deity. Since elohim describes more than one god when translated in the plural form and is used so frequently as a name for God, Trinitarians use it to promote the concept of plurality in reference to God Almighty.
Some Trinitarians interpret the word GOD (Elohim) to mean a group of individuals in one unit, specifically, three persons: God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Ghost, as one God. They believe that the very word elohim sends messages of plurality within the “Godhead”. The doctrine of the Trinity uses the word Elohim to give support to its argument that three persons, Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, can exist as one God. This uniplural interpretation of the word elohim is used to support the Trinitarian dogma in texts of the Bible where the solitary "Oneness" of God is disputed.
When applying the Trinitarian explanation of the word Elohim, we find that God's presentation of His nature is incompatible with Trinitarian thought.


 Genesis 17:1 And when Abram was ninety years old and nine, the LORD appeared to Abram, and said unto him, I am the Almighty God (El- -singular);
Genesis 17:3 And Abram fell on his face: and God (Elohim- -plural) talked with him. God (El- -singular) appeared to Abram. Only one individual appeared in Genesis 17:1, but in 17:3, that same individual, God (Elohim- -plural), appeared to Abram. Was God alone during one moment and accompanied by the other two members of the Trinity in the the next, while Abram continually saw only one LORD? This would be a very difficult feat regardless of the semantic side stepping. The method of explanation implemented by Trinitarians to avoid this potential contradiction in their doctrine is to believe that the triune nature of God was appearing to Abram and talking to him.
If Trinitarians do not interpret El to be the entire Godhead, then one member of the Godhead is claiming to be "Almighty" over the other two members. Does this manner of interpretation remain consistent with the basic truths of the Bible? It is not consistent with the Bible, nor with common sense! ration


Should a subject like this be of any more than passing interest? Supporters of the Trinity say that it is founded not only on religious tradition but also in the bible. Critics of the doctrine say that is not a bible teaching. Should this doctrine be embraced in Christendom?
Countless pages have been written attempting to explain the Trinity, Yet after struggling through the storm of confusion and explanations, investigators still come away unsatisfied.
Paul once wrote:

“the time is sure to come when far from being content with sound teaching, people will be devoted for the latest novelty and collect themselves a whole series of teachers according to their own tastes; and the truth, they will turn to myths” 2 Timothy 4:3

Trinity is a matter of formal belief, but it has a little or no effect in the day to day Christian life and worship yet it is the central doctrine of the churches.
Many centuries before the time of Jesus the Christ (ON EARTH), there were triads or trinities of gods in ancient Babylonia and Assyria. The French “Lorousse Encyclopaedia of Mythology” notes one such triad in that Mesopotamian area: “The universe was divided into three regions each of which became the domain of a god.
  1. Anu’s was god of the sky.
  2. The earth was ruled and governs by Enlil, and
  3. Ea became god and ruler of the waters.
Together they constituted the triad of the Great Gods. Throughout the ancient world, as far back as Babylonia, the worship of pagan gods grouped in threes or triads was common.
In Indian, e.g., we meet with the Trinitarian group of
  1. Brahma (the creator),
  2. Vishnu (the preserver) and
  3. Shiva (the destroyer);
and
In Egyptian religion with the Trinitarian group of
  1. Osiris (god of the underworld and the dead, husband of Isis and father of Horus),
  2. Isis (the goddess of fertility, generally depicted wearing a cow's horns bearing a golden disc representing the sun. She was the wife of her brother Osiris and the mother of Horus and
  3. Horus (the god of the Sun, the sky, and goodness, usually depicted as having a falcon's head, Horus was the son of Isis and Osiris)
Triad gods influence was prevalent in Egypt, Greece and Rome in the centuries before, during and after Christ. After the death of the apostles such pagan beliefs began to invade Christianity.
Christianity did not destroy paganism; it adopted it....from Egypt came the ideas of the divine trinity. Trinity was a major preoccupation of the Egyptian Theologians. Three gods are combined and treated as a single being, addressed in the singular.
Some of the Christian theologians says that paganism was conquered by Christianity, but they have forgotten that it is equally true that Christianity was corrupted by Paganism.
The following is images of triad gods that I did researched on, I won’t go into details on each of them, but just to draw your attention to what is going on in Christendom.



France. Trinity, c. 14th century C.E.



Norway. Trinity (Father, Son, holy spirit), c. 13th century C.E

  

Germany. Trinity, 20th century C.E.


India. Triune Hindu godhead, c. 7th century C.E.


Italy. Trinity, c. 15th century C.E


Why didn’t the Prophets teach anything on Trinity? The New Testament does not teach that either.
The apostate churches also began other pagan ideas such as hell fire and immortality of the soul. Spiritually speaking, Christendom had entered its foretold dark ages, dominated by a growing “man of lawlessness” clergy class - 2 Thess. 2:3, 7
In the bible we read

“Who, existing in the form of God, did not consider equality with God; as something to be used for His own advantage,” Philippians 2:6 

Jesus our saviour never ever, not once considered himself equal with the father, for he knew that he has a father.
The basic faith (belief) of traditional Christianity is the Trinity. The Trinity is a pagan doctrine taken from other religions, which became a part of Christianity. Trinity does not belong to the original teachings of Christianity. The Catholic Church established this doctrine during the NICENE Council in 325 After Jesus Died. This is the same Nicene Council that changed the Passover to Easter.

The Nicene states the belief that the FATHER, SON and HOLY SPIRIT are one GOD. Yet it also states that each one is separate and eternal... This Nicene Creed which establishes the doctrine of the Trinity teaches that the Holy Spirit is a separate being of a triune GOD.
They fail to understand that God is spirit and he uses his Spirit to do his will. It is his power and is subject to him. God is not subject to his spirit or Jesus but they are rather subject to God...
If people were to read the bible from cover to cover without a preconceived idea of Trinity, would they arrive at such a concept on their own? NOT AT ALL
The doctrine of the trinity is so absolutely fundamental to the followers of Christendom that it is just taken for granted. They do not even deem it necessary to explain it, prove it, or in any way substantiate whether or not such a thing actually exists or is even so much as mentioned in the entirety of the Holy Scriptures! Although lacking any Scriptural proof to validate such a theory, denying the trinity is nonetheless considered heresy of the highest magnitude.
The popular hymn goes:

"Holy Holy Holy, Lord God Al-mighty, God in three per-sons, Bless-ed trin-i-ty"
"God is a TRINITY" we have been told by the world’s leading theologians. That is, "God" is composed of THREE PERSONS. They are:
1. God the Father
2. The Holy Ghost [Spirit]
3. Christ Jesus the Son of God.
With just the above statement (which is accurate according to Christian teaching) we already have several unscriptural problems!
Learn something important and profound: Whenever the theologians try to teach you a doctrine that is Unscriptural, they will always be forced to use words that are unscriptural just like Rapture, Hellfire e.t.c

·         First of all, nowhere in the Scriptures is God referred to or called a "trinity."
·         Second, the word "three" is never used in reference to Who or What God is.
·         Third, God is never called or referred to as "a PERSON."
·         Four, the Holy Spirit is never called "God."
·         Five, since Christ is the Son, He cannot also be the Father or be coequal with His Father. Christ plainly said:

"My Father is GREATER than I" (John 14:28).
The Holy Spirit is never called God, God is never referred to as a trinity or a person or consisting of three, and Christ is the Son of the Father, YET this mysterious doctrine is believed by millions. Why? CHRISTIANS! We Are Very Sad People Because We Allow Our Life To Be Run By Theologians Yet We Talk Against Theologians In The Pulpit.
Let’s see if Hastings Dictionary of the Bible can help us.
Page 1015: TRINITY--The Christian doctrine of God as existing in three persons and one Substance …

The Trinity defines God as three persons. God is spirit not a person, not even one scripture proclaims that God is a person... from the dictionary definition,
Person: a living human; a living human body.
The bible says God is one and he is divine (spirit) - not a person
Even the most casual reader of the Scriptures knows that God is not composed of some kind of substance. That’s unscriptural nonsense... The Scriptures are plain:
"God is SPIRIT, and those who are worshiping Him must be worshiping in spirit and truth" (John 4:24)

Spirit has nothing to do with "substance." In the original Greek, God is called "spirit," not "a spirit." There is a big difference. Likewise, God is God not a God.
The existence of a trinity is admittedly not demonstrable by logic or scriptural proof; however, it is called a "necessary hypothesis."Being the inquisitive person that I am, I would inquire as to just why is it a "necessary hypothesis"? Why hypothesize at all, seeing that the Scriptures give us plain, factual, actual information without having to theorize or hypothesize? Let’s get a definition of that word "hypothesis:"
Webster’s Dictionaryhypothesis, a system or theory imagined or assumed to account for what is not understood. An unproved theory, theory, a speculative plan... a formulation of underlying principles of certain observed phenomena which has been verified to some degree... a conjecture; guess.

From Encyclopaedia Britannica Vol. 2, page 480: trinity is quoted as this,
TRINITY: Fundamental Conception. This conception of the Trinity is systematically developed by theologians, Greek, Latin and Protestant...The doctrine, then, is primarily religious and if we define God--as in practice religion does--as ‘That which has an absolute claim upon our obedience’ or as ‘the Supreme Object of our reverence,’ the paradoxical element in the doctrine is at least diminished...Is there, then any insuperable difficulty in the notion of a threefold personal embodiment of the one Divine Will and Character, an embodiment so complete in each case that contact with the Divine Person is contact with God:...This ultimate unity of subordination to a single principle is not necessarily identical with the unity which comes from being included within the mind of a single Divine Being. Nor is it obviously identical with the theologian’s ‘numerical unity of substance.’ The Unity, then, of the Object of our supreme reverence and trust is not plainly inconsistent with the existence of personal distinctions (in the modern sense of the word) within the Godhead. It was probably an afterthought to regard the doctrine of the Trinity as providing a more satisfactory conception of ‘personality in God’ than could grow up under a ‘uninpersonal’ theology. Yet Trinitarians has some points of superiority over a theory which may compel us to conceive God as waking up at the Creation from ‘an eternity of idleness.’ ...It has been similarly argued that in conceiving the ‘not-self with which God contrasts Himself’ as ‘wholly internal to His essence’ while the unity (the Holy Spirit) ‘within which the relation of the two falls is not, as in us, a dark mystery at the back of our life but something which ‘proceeds from both’ we have ‘the best notion that we can frame of Being at its highest.’ Such an argument leads not merely to a plurality but to a trinity of Divine persons, and supports the Western doctrine of the procession of the Spirit from the Father and the Son. (End of Britannica quote).

Wow! What an intellectual enlightenment! What an exposition of deep mysteries! What profound theological insight! WHAT A CROCK . . .!!!
Notice what Paul instructs those who would teach God’s Word:

"For if a trumpet, also, should be giving a dubious sound, who will be preparing for battle? THUS, YOU ALSO, if you should not be giving an INTELLIGIBLE expression through the language, HOW WILL IT BE KNOWN WHAT IS BEING SPOKEN?"

Does this verse need any comment? Does anyone think for one moment that the theologians responsible for this Britannica article on the trinity follow Paul’s instructions seriously?
God also warns against...

·         "Adding to" or "taking away from" His Word (Rev. 22:18-10)
·         We are to rightly "divide" God’s Word (II Tim. 2:15-18)
·         We are to "...distinguish the things that DIFFER" (Phil. 1:10)
·         We are to have a "PATTERN OF SOUND WORDS" (II Tim. 1:13-14)
·         Also, we are to shun the "TRADITIONS OF MEN" (Col. 2:8)
·         and the "WISDOM OF THIS WORLD" (I Cor. 1:20 & 3:19)

Dr. Ed DeVries, President of the School of Biblical & Theological Studies. In his book "Doctrine of the Trinity" His first paragraph makes the following statements:
"Since the word Trinity IS NOT FOUND ANYWHERE IN THE RECEIVED TEXT or in its offspring (the Authorized Version and other biblical translations derived from the received text), many argue that the doctrine of the Trinity is NOT A BIBLICAL ONE. However, when a person comes to understand the THEORY [yes dear readers, we are back to that word "theory" again] that is embodied in the terminology they can NOT HELP BUT FIND PROOF OF THE TRINITY THROUGHOUT THE BIBLE. The doctrine of the Trinity is believed by ALL Christian groups. Some groups profess to be Christian and DO NOT believes in the Trinity, however, none of these groups are truly Christians..." (Bold underlined emphasis mine--of course).
Did you get all that? Notice that in order to "find PROOF of the trinity THROUGHOUT the Bible," all one has to do is come to "understand the theory that is embodied in the terminology." That is unscriptural nonsense!

Please understand and believe me when I say that I am not poking fun at such teachers or men of GOD as this. I am not, but I am poking fun at their stupid, stupid teachings! God inspired the proverb that teaches us to:

Answer a fool with his own stupidity, or he will think he is wise (Prov. 26:5, Gods word Translation)
and  
"...expose those who contradict..." (Titus 1:9, Concordant Literal New Testament).

Since the word Trinity is used to represent God as a triune being, what is triune? Noah Webster defined the word triune to mean, “three in one.” This means that God, a singular being, exists in a PLURAL manner... The Hebrew name for God used in all known manuscripts is ELOHIM... The word ELOHIM means three in one. This is exactly what they are trying to imply, this is nonsense and I mean unscriptural nonsense!
Did I miss something? Noah Webster defines the word "triune" to mean "three in one," and therefore we have PROOF THAT GOD IS A TRINITY? What kind of scholarship is that?
The Hebrew word Elohim [eloheem] is the plural form of Elowahh [eloah] which answers to "The Deity." The Greek word generally used in the New Testament for God which answers to the Hebrew word Elohim is Theos which means PLACER (God), literally Disposer or Arbiter. Let’s hold this thought we shall explain it in detail later.
Let’s look at a few Scriptures that Trinitarians claim add credence to their theory. I will take no more than a few pages to try and clarify the Scriptural teaching on who, what, and how many Gods there really are.

ERRORS FROM OUR FATHERS (Translators and Copyists)
First of all we must dispense with 1 John 5:7 which reads in the King James Version
"For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one."
There is a problem with this verse. The words that I typed in bold print above are not Scripture. They should NOT be in the Bible. There are many Bibles that do not contain these words. Here are a few:
I John 5:7 The Concordant Literal New Testament"...seeing that three there are that are testifying, the spirit, and the water, and the blood, and the three are for the one thing."
I John 5:7 New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures"For there are three witness bearers, the spirit and the water and the blood, and the three are in agreement."
I John 5:7 A New Translation by James Moffatt"The witnesses are three, the Spirit and the water and the blood, and the three of them are in accord."
I John 5:7 The Emphatic Diaglott"For there are three which testify; the Spirit, and the water, and the blood; and the three are of one."
The Emphatic Diaglott has a footnote:

"This text concerning the heavenly witnesses [as found in some versions] is NOT contained in ANY GREEK manuscript which was written earlier than the 15th century. It is not cited by ANY of the Greek ecclesiastical writers; nor by ANY of the early Latin fathers..."
I John 5:7 The Holy Bible--New Catholic Version: "For there are three that bear witness [in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one. And there are three that bear witness on earth]: the Spirit, and the water, and the blood; and these three are one."

This is a lie, but to support the DOCTRINE OF TRINITY, The translators and copyist inserted this into the scriptures.
The brackets in green are supplied by the translators and copyist. This version also has a footnote:
"According to the evidence of many manuscripts, and the majority of commentators, these verses should read: ‘for there are three that bear witness: the Spirit, and the water, and the blood; and these three are one.’

The New Testament from 26 Translations: Footnote, page 1183:
"The words between ‘bear record’ (Vs. 7) and ‘the spirit’ (Vs. 8) are now recognized as not adequately supported by original manuscripts."
As those words were hand written in a copy of a manuscript as late as the 15th century and do not appear in ANY Greek manuscript, they have no place in the inspired Word of God.
The following scripture is another favourite scripture used by Trinitarians to support the Trinity Doctrine.

"I and the Father, We are ONE" (John 10:30).
Let me be perfectly clear, logical, and Scriptural on this matter:
One plus one plus one DOES NOT equal one!
One God plus one God plus one God DOES NOT equal one God!
One third of a God plus one third of a God plus one third of a God DOES NOT equal one whole God!
The Holy Spirit of God cannot also be that same God! ANYTHING that is either "from" or "of" something ELSE cannot also "BE" that something else no matter what or who it is!
A "Father" and a "Son" CANNOT ALSO BE THE SAME PERSON!
Countless things can be said to "be ONE" in numerous forms of close relationship. In this close relationship of purpose, will, harmony, etc., our Lord said:
"I and the Father, We are ONE" (John 10:30).
Jesus made a clear and a specific statement. Jesus DID NOT say "I and the Father, We are one GOD," did He? No, He did not!

Do the Scriptures, however, tell us that there is only ONE GOD? Yes, they do.
Do the Scriptures, however, tell us WHO that ONE God is? Yes, they do.
Do the Scriptures tell us what the relationship of Jesus Christ is with that ONE God? Yes, they do.
In fact, all of these things are answered in ONE Scripture.
I will now give you the ONLY Scripture you will EVER need for understanding Who Jesus Christ and God the Father are and how many Gods there are, and who composes that ONE God. Here it is:

"For even if so be that there are those being termed gods, whether in heaven or on earth, even as there are many gods and many lords, nevertheless for US there is ONE GODthe FATHERout of Whom ALL is, and we for Him, and ONE LORDJESUS CHRIST, through Whom all is, and we through Him" (1 Cor. 8:5-6).

Can this make trinity possible? NEVER!
And the next verse says
"But NOT IN ALL is there this knowledge" (1 Cor.8: 7)
I can say "Amen" to that. Practically "not in all" Christendom is there this knowledge.
THANKED GOD for making these things so clear, so meaningful, and so simple, DO IT NOW! The man in collar does not know this so they can’t teach you but follow the stupid traditional teaching of the uncircumcised theologians.
Is Jesus Christ an equal part of this "ONE God?" NO, He is not. Let God’s Word tell us. We don’t need to speculate and theorize. Here is who and What Jesus Christ is, He is the "one LORD." This is not hard. It is only hard for those who wrestle and twist Scripture to their own destruction (II Peter 3:16)

John 8:5-6 makes the following very clear:
This Scripture tells us that "ALL IS OUT OF" GOD (the FATHER).
And this Scripture tells us that "ALL IS THROUGH" Jesus Christ.
God the Father is the first cause of all and ALL IS OUT OF GOD, even Jesus Christ is "OUT of God." So Where Is Trinity?
"...I [Jesus] came OUT from God. I CAME OUT FROM the FATHER..." (John 16:27-28).

Now if Jesus came out from the trinity, why doesn’t the Scripture say so? He didn’t come out of the trinity and He didn’t come out of the Holy Spirit, but HE DID COME, "...OUT FROM THE FATHER!"
And after Jesus Christ came OUT from the Father, ALL ELSE came THROUGH Jesus Christ:
"Who [Jesus Christ] is the Image of the invisible God, Firstborn of every creature, for in Him is ALL CREATED, that in the heavens and that on the earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones, or lordships, or sovereignties, or authorities, all is created THROUGH Him and FOR Him, and He is BEFORE all, and all has its cohesion in Him" (Col. 1: 14-17).

Nowhere do we read that God came out from Christ! No, Christ came OUT FROM THE FATHER and all else was created THROUGH Jesus Christ.
Jesus Christ is not the SUPREME DEITY. Christ is not the originator of all. Christ is "the Lord." He is the Son of God. He is the IMAGE of the invisible God. He is the Mediator, The name of God is in Him.

For there is ONE God, and ONE Mediator OF God and mankind, a MAN Christ Jesus..." (I Tim. 2:5).

As I said before, one cannot be both "of" something or someone and at the same time "be" that something or someone. There is certainly no trilateral, triune, trinity of God here!
Jesus Christ said,

"...I am going to the Father, for the Father is GREATER than I" (John 14:28).

Where do we read that Christ is GREATER than the Father? There is no trinity in this verse!
And again:
"Now, whenever ALL may be subjected to Him, then the Son Himself [Jesus Christ] also shall be SUBJECTED to him [God the Father] who subjects all to Him, that GOD may be ALL IN ALL."1 Cor. 15:28

Where do we read that someday God the Father will be SUBJECT to Christ? There is no trinity in these Biblical truths.
And again:

"Now I want you to be aware that the Head of every man is Christ, yet the head of the woman is the man, yet the Head of Christ IS GOD" (I Cor. 11:3).

Where do we read in Scripture that Christ is the Head of God?
There is another profound statement in the Scriptures that PROVES CONCLUSIVELY that Jesus Christ is not part of a trinity, but is now and always will be, under the Headship of His Father. Here it is:
"...that the GOD OF OUR LORD Jesus Christ, the FATHER..." (Eph. 1:17).
There it is--Jesus Christ HAS A "GOD!" Paul wrote this and all of the above Scriptures AFTER Jesus Christ was resurrected and restored to His previous GLORIES in God. And in His glorified state, Jesus Christ is STILL subjected to HIS GOD! Who wants to be the first blasphemer to even suggest that God the Father "has a God?"!!! But Jesus Christ DOES have a God! Notice the following:

Eph. 1:3: "Blessed be the God and Father OF our Lord Jesus Christ"
Col. 1:3: "We are thanking the God and Father OF our Lord Jesus Christ"
I Pet. 1:3: "Blessed be the God and Father OF our Lord Jesus Christ"

And remember these statements concerning Jesus Christ "having a God" were made long after His resurrection and restoration back to His former glories. Today, our Lord STILL HAS A GOD! And need I repeat the fact that the God and Father of Jesus Christ DO NOT HAVE A GOD?! And someone out there still thinks God is an equilateral trinity?
What I Don’t Understand Is, The Apostles Never Ever Talked About Trinity, So Why Do We Make such A Doctrine Out Of The Writings Of The Apostles. ?
What Is Wrong With The Christian Church? I Believe Is Lack of Respect for Biblical Authority due to mis-translations and mis-interpretations,
There are many more Scriptures that show the distinction between God the Father’s office of supreme deity of the universe and that of His Son and Image, Jesus Christ the Lord and Mediator.

Does no one think it strange that in all these pages of Scriptures the "holy spirit" was not even mentioned so much as once? If the Holy Spirit is an EQUAL to the Father and Son, it sure seems it is being short changed in all these profound Scriptures. Could it be that just as Jesus is the Son "of" God and not God Himself, that the Holy Spirit is the spirit "of" God and not God Himself? Yes, that is what the Scriptures clearly teach. We have the Son "of" God and the spirit "of" God and yet God is "of" NO ONE!! Is there anyone who wishes to challenge this?

God Almighty is out of NO ONE! God Almighty is of NO ONE! Yet we have Jesus addressed in the Book of Revelation as the Almighty GOD…yes that is true, but what does that mean? He is the Alpha and Omega…what does that mean? The Beginning and the Last, what does that mean?...

Let it be known: NONE of these Scriptures take away from the glories of God’s grandest achievements in Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour. His name is now and will forever be ABOVE ALL ELSE IN THE UNIVERSE! AMEN!
Here is another main Scripture used by Trinitarians to try and make people believe that God is a trinity:

"Going, then, disciple all nations baptizing them into the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit [Authorized, ghost]..." (Mat. 28:19).
And how does this verse prove that God is a three-in-one trinity? I DON’T KNOW! It certainly doesn’t say that these three form ONE GOD. Or that these three are coequal with one another. They are just all three mentioned in one verse, that’s all.

The mention of the "holy spirit" in this verse no more proves that the holy spirit is the third God part of a trinity than the mention of "the Comforter" in John 15:26 proves that it is the fourth God part of a quartet, or the mention of "the spirit of Truth" in this same verse in the fifth God part of a quintet! But why stop here. If we look for phrases such as "the holy spirit" being representative of some kind of personal being of a multi-person Godhead, we can find a plethora of "gods."
Let’s count them

1. God
2. The Father
3. The Highest
4. The Holy Ghost
5. The Holy Spirit
6. The Spirit of God
7. The Spirit of Christ
8. Jesus Christ
9. The Son of God. We are now up to a TRIPLE trinity.
10. The Mediator
11. The Mind of God
12. The Spirit of truth. Now we have a quartet of trinities
13. The Word was God

And to these we could add "The SEVEN Spirits of God (Rev. 4:5), etc., etc.
We are now up to twenty potential coequal candidates for this so-called triune godhead. Clearly, God is NOT a trinity or a collection of trinities. By the way, "Godhead" is not a proper translation of any Greek word; it should be translated "Deity" or "Divinity."
No matter how many different spirits there are, one thing is certain: ALL SPIRITS ARE IN SUBJECTION TO THE FATHER--NONE ARE EQUAL TO OR WITH THE FATHER, because we have Scriptural proof that God is superior to all spirits, seeing that:

"Yet shall we not much rather be subjected to the FATHER OF SPIRITS..." (Heb. 12:9)

To him who has an ear to hear; let him hear!
No, there are NOT twenty members of a coequal godhead. Not ten or even five. There are not even three or two.
"...there is ONE God, the FATHER..." (I Cor. 8:6)
Bear with me a moment now. Do we all agree that this verse is from the Scriptures and that it is a TRUE statement? Good! Because if this statement is true, then to say that God is a trinity composed of the Father, the Son and the holy ghost [spirit] HAS GOT TO BE A FALSE STATEMENT, because the two statements absolutely CONTRADICT.
Back to the Trinitarians' favourite proof text to support their theory

"Going, then, disciple all the nations, baptizing them into the name of the Father and of the Son and of the holy spirit..." (Mat. 28: 29).

Does anything in this verse preclude the "holy spirit" from being "the holy spirit OF God?" Of course not, God the Father is "holy"[Gk, hagios] (John 17:11), and God the Father is "spirit" [Gk, pneuma] (John 4:24).
No one is denying the close relationship between the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. But close relationship does not prove or even necessarily suggest sameness.
"Consequently, then, no longer are you strangers and sojourners, but are fellow-citizens of the saints and belong to God’s FAMILY..." (Eph. 2:19).
The trinity is like a closed triangle where no one gets in. That is what Satan [the false church] would like people to believe. But, dear reader, God desires a very large family wherein you and I are family members! When were you taught such a marvellous truth in Sunday school? Ultimately, everyone in the entirety of the Universe is going to be one, holy, united, happy, glorious, giant, and FAMILY OF GOD!!!
"...that God may be ALL IN ALL (I Cor. 15:28).

And all the while Christendom is out there spending hundreds of millions of dollars telling the world that a few are going to play harps in heaven while many of their friends, neighbours, and relatives, and indeed the rest of the universe will burn in hell forever. This they proclaim is the good news GOSPEL of God, while Satan chortles in his joy!
Now we are getting down to what the Bible really teaches. God has a family. God is "The FATHER" of His family. Jesus Christ is "the Firstborn SON" of God’s Family.

"Who rescues us out of the jurisdiction of Darkness, and transports us into the kingdom of the SON OF HIS LOVE, in whom we are having the deliverance, the pardon of sins, Who is the Image of the invisible God, FIRSTBORN of every creature..." (Col. 1:13-15)

"For you did not get slavery’s spirit to fear again, but you got the SPIRIT OF SONSHIP in which we are crying, ‘Abba, FATHER !’ The spirit itself is testifying together with our spirit that WE ARE CHILDREN OF GOD" (Rom. 8:14-16).

Yes, God wants sons (and daughters, of course).
"Blessed be the God and FATHER of our Lord Jesus Christ, Who blesses us with every spiritual blessing among the celestials, in Christ, according as He chooses us in Him before the disruption of the world, we to be holy, and flawless in His sight, in love designating us beforehand for the place of a SON..." (Eph. 1:3-5).

If God is a closed triune Godhead (as theologians call it), then there would be NO PLACE FOR SONS INSIDE OF THAT CLOSED TRINITY! God could never be, "...ALL IN ALL."
Everything that God the Father gave to His son Christ Jesus, He is going to GIVE TO US! And this includes being His CHILDREN.

"Now when the full time came, God delegates His Son, come of a woman, come under law, that He should be reclaiming those under law that WE may be getting the place of a SON. Now, seeing that you are SONS, GOD DELEGATES THE SPIRIT OF HIS SON INTO OUR HEARTS, CRYING, ‘ABBA! FATHER !’ So that you are no longer a slave, but a SON, Now if a SON, an enjoyer also of an allotment from God, through Christ" (Gal. 4:6-7).

God almighty will be the same "Abba FATHER" to us, as He was also "Abba FATHER" to our Lord Jesus Christ (Mark 14:36). Did you catch that it is the "...spirit OF His [the Father’s] Son..." That comes into our hearts. It is NOT the "the holy spirit which is supposedly the third person of the trinity" that comes into our hearts, but Christ’s spirit. The spirit of God and the spirit of Christ are the same spirit and it is THEIR spirit not a third person (God) of a trinity!

So God is the Father of Jesus Christ His Son. But who or what then is the "holy ghost" [spirit]? The Bible speaks much about Christ’s relationship with the Father. It says NOTHING of a relationship with "the holy spirit." And yet, Jesus was CONCEIVED by the HOLY SPIRIT!
"...the angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a dream, saying, Joseph, thou son of David, fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife: for that which is CONCEIVED IN HER IS OF THE HOLY GHOST" (Mat. 1:20).

Here is a Scripture so simple that any child above the age of seven can surely understand. And with its understanding comes the total demise of the trinity theory. We learned in Eph. 1:17, that God is both the GOD AND FATHER of our Lord Jesus Christ,
"...the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, THE FATHER of glory..."
Okay, here it is--you’re going to love this: If the holy ghost is actually and literally "God" as Trinitarians maintain, and Jesus was "CONCEIVED" by the Holy Ghost, then Jesus would have to be "The Son of the Holy Ghost" and not the Son of God the Father! It is not physiologically or Scriptural possible to be "conceived" by one person and then when born, be the son of another person! Whoever causes women to conceive is also the FATHER of the child conceived, NOT ANOTHER AND DIFFERENT PERSON! Jesus was conceived by the holy spirit "OF" God. It was the spirit OF the Father, not some other spirit or ghost that caused Mary to conceive. Therefore "God," not the "spirit of God," is the FATHER of Jesus.
Next we will see that the second witness to this same event in Luke 1:35 comes right out and says who the Father of Jesus is:

"And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Ghost [spirit] shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son OF GOD."

Not the son of the Holy Ghost (capital letters were not used in the Greek text and so "Holy Spirit" has no reason to be capitalized here). "...the HIGHEST..." also refers to God the Father, not the holy spirit.
Let me assure my readers that God did not have intercourse with Mary to cause her to conceive. God, who is called "THE POWER OF THE HIGHEST”, caused Mary to conceive by and through His own "holy spirit," Hence Jesus is the Son of the Highest, the Son of the Father, the Son of God, but NOT the son of the Holy Spirit! Back up to Vs.30-32
"And the angel said unto her, Fear not, Mary: for thou hast found favour with God [not favour with the Holy Spirit]. And, behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring forth a son, and shalt call his name JESUS. He shall be great, and shall be called the SON OF THE HIGHEST [not the son of the Holy Spirit]: and the Lord God [not the Holy Spirit] shall give unto him the throne of his father David."

In Matt. 12:28 Jesus said He cast out demons "by the SPIRIT of God." Yet the Pharisees claimed He did it by the power of Beezeboul. Jesus told the Pharisees that accusing Him of casting out demons "by the power of Beezeboul," when He did it by the "spirit of God," is blasphemy against the "HOLY SPIRIT" (Vs. 32).
Here is clear and simple proof that the "spirit of God" and the "holy spirit" are ONE AND THE SAME SPIRIT...not a third person of a so-called trinity!
Again let me state: Anything that is "of" or "from" someone else cannot BE that same someone else! Nothing can be "of" someone and yet, at the same time, "be" that same someone! This is axiomatic.
The Holy Spirit is something that God the Father possesses--it is not a separate, third god or deity of some fabled trinity. The spirit "of" God is "God’s" spirit. And notice that God offers His spirit as a gift to those who ask:

"If ye then, being evil, know how to give good gifts unto your children: how much more shall your heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to them that ask him?" (Luke 11:13)

The Holy Spirit is not an entity of its own, but is rather a possession of God which He gives to us.
And notice that even the King James Version in this verse uses the word Spirit instead of Ghost as they normally do in translating the same identical Greek word pneuma.
We read in the latter chapters of John’s gospel just how intimate and loving and close Jesus is with His Father and His Father with Him. This is emphasized over and over again dozens of times in the Scriptures. However, there is NO SUCH INTIMACY mentioned between the Holy Ghost [spirit] and the Father or with Jesus Christ. The reason is clear. The holy spirit of God is not a deity or god with a personal relationship with the Father or Christ, but is rather THEIR spirit. We will show from Scripture that both the Father and His Son have, and posses "holy spirit," and that They BOTH impart that same spirit to US! And that is how they BOTH dwell with us and in us and make their abode with us (John 14:23).

The Holy Spirit is not the sister of Jesus, nor the brother, nor the mother and certainly not a SECOND Father! It is futile to try and make the Holy Spirit into a "god" distinct from Jesus Christ and God the Father. Again, Jesus said that He and His Father are ONE. He never said that He and the Holy Spirit are ONE. It is rather THROUGH the Holy Spirit that the Son is in the Father and the Father is in the Son, and we are in Christ and Christ is in us and the Father is in us!

Next let’s consider who or what is the "comforter" mentioned only in John’s gospel account.
"And I will pray the Father, and He shall give you [it is not "from" the Holy Spirit, but "from" the Father] another Comforter [this word does not require a capital letter]that he [it] may abide with you forever [Gk: for the aion--eon or age]. Even the Spirit of truth..." (John 14:16-17 KJV).

Remember that Jesus said "I am the truth." How then can this "comforter" be coming from both His Father and Himself? Is this possible? Once we understand just what this "spirit of truth," "spirit of God," "holy spirit," "holy ghost," "comforter” really is we will see that it certainly DOES come from both the Father and His Son Jesus Christ.
It is evident when checking various translations that the translators did not have a clear idea as to just what they should call this "comforter." In the Greek, the word is [parakletos BESIDE-CALLER].

·         It can be "consoler" or "Entreater" in I John 2:1.
·         The Moffatt translation has "...to give you another Helper..."
·         The New Testament of Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ has "...another Advocate..."
·         The Revised Standard Version has "...Counselor..."
·         The Monsignor Knox version has "...another to befriend you..."
·         The Phillips Translation has "...someone else to stand by you..."
·         And the Amplified New Testament has "...another Comforter (Counselor, Helper, Intercessor, Advocate, Strengthener and Standby)..."

It should be noted that not all translators capitalize this Greek word parakletos in their translations, nor do all translators use the pronoun "he" but rather "it."
From The Concordant Literal New Testament:

John 14:16-18 (CLT), "And I shall be asking the Father, and He will be giving you another consoler, that IT, indeed, may be with you for the eon--the spirit of truth, which the world cannot get, for IT is not beholding it, neither is knowing it. Yet you know it, for IT is remaining with you and will be in you. I will not leave you bereaved; I am COMING TO YOU."

In this section of Scripture, Philip, Thomas, Peter, and Judas (and possibly all the Apostles) did not quite understand what Christ was teaching them. They especially didn’t understand how that Jesus was going away and that they could not come with him, but that it was necessary for Him to go away to His Father, or He could not send them the comforter or consoler.
Jesus was assuredly "the spirit of truth" of which He spoke. And as such Jesus was with the disciples. But now He is telling them that when He leaves them to be with the Father, He will come back to them, only this time He will not just be with them, but He will be in them! The spirit of truth was with the apostles in the person of Jesus Christ, but He told them that after He left to be with the Father that this same spirit of truth would be in them. This is all done by "spirit," the spirit of God.

Notice John 14: 26
"Now the consoler, THE HOLY SPIRIT, which the Father will be sending in MY NAME..."
And see how this is done, Vs. 23:
"If anyone should be loving Me, he will be keeping My word, and My Father will be loving him, and WE shall be coming to him and making OUR abode with him.

This is done through the consoler, the comforter, the spirit of truth, THE HOLY SPIRIT of God! Jesus said He would not leave them "comfortless" (Vs. 18), so for sure Jesus must return to His followers to "comfort" them. This He did and still does by the "spirit of God" which God gave to His son Jesus and which the Father then turns around and gives FROM that very same spirit in Christ TO US! The following Scripture make this plain:
"All things that the Father hath are mine [all things include the Holy Spirit]: therefore said I, that He shall take of Mine [that is, of the spirit that His Father gave to Him], and shall shew it UNTO YOU" (John 16:15).
Here is one more proof that the "holy ghost [spirit]" and the "spirit of God" are one and the same. Here is what Jesus told His disciples would happen when they would be brought before magistrates and powers:

"And when they bring you unto the synagogues, and unto magistrates, and powers, take ye no thought how or what thing ye shall answer, or what ye shall say: For the Holy Ghost shall teach you in the same hour what ye ought to say" (Luke 12:11-12).
In the very same account of this portion of Christ’s teaching in Matthew’s gospel, we read this:
"But beware of men: for they will deliver you up to the councils, and they will scourge you in their synagogues; And ye shall be brought before governors and kings for my sake, for a testimony against them and the Gentiles. But when they deliver you up, take no thought how or what ye shall speak: for it shall be given you in that same hour what ye shall speak. For it is not ye that speak, but the Spirit of your Father which speaketh in you”

There can be no doubt from these two accounts that the "Holy Ghost [spirit]" and the "Spirit of your Father" are one and the same spirit--THE SPIRIT OF GOD! NOT a third person of some fabled trinity!
Now let us recap what we have learned so far and bring it all in one lively summary.

WHO AND WHAT IS GOD? (God Is One)
In the Hebrew Scriptures like I said earlier on, the word ´eloh'ah (god) has two plural forms, namely, ´elo·him' (gods) and ´elo·heh' (gods of). These plural forms generally refer to Almighty God?, in which case they are translated in the singular as "God." Do these plural forms indicate a Trinity? No, they do not. In A Dictionary of the Bible, William Smith says: "The fanciful idea that [´elo·him'] referred to the trinity of persons in the Godhead hardly finds now a supporter among scholars. It is either what grammarians call the plural of majesty, or it denotes the fullness of divine strength, the sum of the powers displayed by God."
The American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literatures says of ´elo·him': "It is almost invariably construed with a singular verbal predicate, and takes a singular adjectival attribute." To illustrate this, the title ´elo·him' appears 35 times by itself in the account of creation, and every time the verb describing what God said and did is singular. (Genesis 1:1-2:4) Thus, that publication concludes: "[´Elo·him'] must rather be explained as an intensive plural, denoting greatness and majesty."


´Elo·him' means, not "persons," but "gods." So those who argue that this word implies a Trinity make themselves polytheists, worshipers of more than one God. Why? Because it would mean that there were three gods in the Trinity. But nearly all Trinity supporters reject the view that the Trinity is made up of three separate gods.
The Bible also uses the words ´elo·him' and ´elo·heh' when referring to a number of false idol gods. (Exodus 12:12; 20:23) But at other times it may refer to just a single false god, as when the Philistines referred to "Dagon their god [´elo·heh']." (Judges 16:23, 24) Baal is called "a god [´elo·him']." (1 Kings 18:27) In addition, the term is used for humans. (Psalm 82:1, 6) Moses was told that he was to serve as "God" [´elo·him'] to Aaron and to Pharaoh. Exodus 4:16; 7:1.


Obviously, using the titles ´elo·him' and ´elo·heh' for false gods, and even humans, did not imply that each was a plurality of gods; neither does applying ´elo·him' or ´elo·heh' to Almighty God mean that he is more than one person, especially when we consider the testimony of the rest of the Bible on this subject.


"There is ONE GOD, the FATHER, out of Whom ALL is..." (I Cor. 8:6)
"For there is ONE God" (I Tim. 2:5)
"You are my witnesses whether there is any god, any Power, any besides ME" (Isa. 44:8 Moffatt Translation)
"The ONE Who is operating ALL in accord with the counsel of HIS will..." (Eph. 1:11)
"Out of Him and through Him and for Him is ALL: to HIM be the glory for the eons! Amen!" (Rom. 11:36)
"...your heavenly Father IS PERFECT" (Mat. 5:48)
"God IS LOVE(I John 4:8)
"God IS SPIRIT" (John 4:24)
"...the INVISIBLE GOD" (II Cor. 4:4)
"Now it is eonian life that they may know Thee, the ONLY TRUE GOD, and Him Whom Thou dost commission, Jesus Christ" (John 17:3).
Jesus called His Father "...the ONLY TRUE GOD" (Jn. 17:3).
"God is NOT A MAN..." (I Sam. 15:29)
“I am YAHWEH, and there is NONE ELSE. Besides me, there is no God. I will strengthen you, though you have not known me;” Isaiah 45:5
“That they may know that thou ALONE, whose name is JEHOVAH, art the Most High over all the earth” Psalm 83:18

God the creator has got no name that can be written on paper…we can create names for him and accept it in agreement GLOBAL, but that still does not spell god’s name….THEY ARE ALL TITLES…give it up!
Remember that one of the ways YHWH has been translated is "The Self-Existent one." What does this mean? Did the ancient ISRAEL have the right knowledge about who GOD THE FATHER is? I don’t think so,
Something is self-existent if it can exist all by itself, without any dependencies whatsoever. Everything we encounter in life is dependent on something else. Life needs air. Air needs molecules. Molecules need molecular cohesion. Molecular cohesion needs.......and so on. Where does the chain of dependency end? What is the "ontological anchor" of the universe?
GOD THE FATHER the creator of the universe depends only on Himself for existence. He is the source and origin of all that exists. In Him we live and move and have our being.
That is why YHWH is sometimes translated the self-existent one.

THE GOD ALMIGHTY! WHO IS HE?
Jesus said to the apostles:
·         "And the Father Himself, which hath sent me, has born witness of Me. ye have neither HEARD HIS VOICE at any time, NOR SEEN HIS SHAPE" (John 5:37).

·         “No one has seen God at any time. The only begotten Son (Gk. theos = GOD), who is in the bosom of the Father, He has declared Him.” John 1:18 
Some translations put GOD in place of the SON which is the proper translation. The word translated SON in the Greek manuscript is theos” so why SON.theos”  has always mean God.


WHOSE VOICE IS THIS IF NO MAN HAS NEVER EVER HEARD THE VOICE OF GOD THE FATHER BEFORE???

Mat 3:17 And lo A VOICE FROM HEAVEN, saying, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased
.

The question is whose voice is this? Since no man has seen the Father or heard His voice who then could be speaking these Words?

We have had answers ranging from angels, to spiritual words that only could have been heard with spiritual ears to the Father manipulating the natural elements (air, clouds, wind, etc.) to proclaim His message of pleasure in His Son…but these answers are not acceptable anyway.


Actually there is no great mystery concerning this
"voice" from heaven.

At Jesus' baptism we read:
"And lo A VOICE FROM HEAVEN, saying, This is My Beloved Son, in Whom I am well pleased" (Matt. 3:17). Mark 1:11 and Luke 3:22 say virtually the same words.

Again in in
John 12:28 we read: "Father, Glorify Your Name. Then came there A VOICE FROM HEAVEN, saying, I have both glorified it, and will glorify it again."
                                                                                           
On what is called 'The Mount of Transfiguration," we read this, "While he yet spake, behold, a bright cloud overshadowed them: and behold A VOICE OUT OF THE CLOUD, which said, This is My Beloved Son, in Whom I am well pleased; hear you Him" (Matt. 17::5).

And this was something James, John, and Peter never forgot:
“but [we] were eyewitnesses of His Majesty. For He received from God the Father honour and glory, when there came such A VOICE TO HIM FROM THE EXCELLENT GLORY, This is My Beloved Son, in Whom I am well pleased" (II Pet. 1:17).

In all cases it is called
"A VOICE," so this does not contradict the Scriptures which state that no man has ever heard the voice of God the Father. It was "A VOICE," but it is a message from God the Father. What is important is WHERE it came from, and WHAT the message was. In all cases the voice came FROM A HEAVENLY source, and the message established Jesus Christ as the greatest Human Who has ever lived, and the only one acknowledged by God, to "PLEASE" God.

The message is from God out of Heaven, but it is delivered by a messenger. A dozen times in the book of Revelation we have messages from God delivered out of Heaven by messengers.

Now read all these scriptures below which talks about GOD ALMIGHTY, and combine the messages from Jesus            above and then tell me what you think khodjo74@hotmail.com.
What you need to remember is that, no one has heard his voice before, and no one has neither seen his image before.

“And God said unto him, I [am] God Almighty: be fruitful and multiply; a nation and a company of nations shall be of thee, and kings shall come out of thy loins” GEN 35:11
And I heard another out of the altar say, Even so, Lord God Almighty, true and righteous [are] thy judgments (but i thought the bible says God The Father judges no one but all judgements has been given to the Son). REV 16:7
Saying, We give thee thanks, O Lord God Almighty, which art, and wast, and art to come; because thou hast taken to thee thy great power, and hast reigned. REV 11:17
And I saw no temple therein: for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are the temple of it. REV 21:22
And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by [the name of] God Almighty, but by my name JEHOVAH was I not known to them. 

EXODUS 6:3……see Genesis 15:7, where God reveals himself to Abraham by this very name: And he said unto him, I am Jehovah, that brought thee out of Ur of the Chaldees. How then can it be said that by his name Jehovah he was not known unto them?  START THINKING.
And Jacob said unto Joseph, God Almighty appeared unto me at Luz in the land of Canaan, and blessed me, GEN 48:3 …no one sees God and live!!!
And God Almighty bless thee, and make thee fruitful, and multiply thee, that thou mayest be a multitude of people; GEN 28:3
And when Abram was ninety years old and nine, the LORD appeared to Abram, and said unto him, I [am] the Almighty God; walk before me, and be thou perfect GEN 17:1 …no one sees God and live!!!
And God Almighty give you mercy before the man, that he may send away your other brother, and Benjamin. If I be bereaved [of my children], I am bereaved. GEN 43:14

And they sing the song of Moses the servant of God, and the song of the Lamb, saying, Great and marvellous [are] thy works, Lord God Almighty; just and true [are] thy ways, thou King of saints REV 15:3
The Lord GOD hath sworn by himself, saith the LORD the God of hosts, I abhor the excellency of Jacob, and hate his palaces: therefore will I deliver up the city with all that is therein. AMOS 6:8
Hear ye, and testify in the house of Jacob, saith the Lord GOD, the God of hosts, AMOS 3:13
Hate the evil, and love the good, and establish judgment in the gate: it may be that the LORD God of hosts will be gracious unto the remnant of Joseph. AMOS 5:15

Therefore the LORD, the God of hosts (ALMIGHTY), the Lord, saith thus; Wailing [shall be] in all streets; and they shall say in all the highways, Alas! alas! and they shall call the husbandman to mourning, and such as are skilful of lamentation to wailing. AMOS 5:16
He answered, "LORD God of Armies, I have eagerly served you. The Israelites have abandoned your promises, torn down your altars, and executed your prophets. I'm the only one left, and they're trying to take my life."1 KINGS 19:14
And he said, I have been very jealous for the LORD God of hosts (ALMIGHTY): for the children of Israel have forsaken thy covenant, thrown down thine altars, and slain thy prophets with the sword; and I, [even] I only, am left; and they seek my life, to take it away. 1 KINGS 19:10

Therefore now thus saith the LORD, the God of hosts (ALMIGHTY), the God of Israel; Wherefore commit ye [this] great evil against your souls, to cut off from you man and woman, child and suckling, out of Judah, to leave you none to remain; JEREMIAH 44:7
Then said Jeremiah unto Zedekiah, Thus saith the LORD, the God of hosts, the God of Israel; If thou wilt assuredly go forth unto the king of Babylon's princes, then thy soul shall live, and this city shall not be burned with fire; and thou shalt live, and thine house: JERERMIAH 38:17
O LORD God of hosts, hear my prayer: give ear, O God of Jacob. Selah PSALM 84:8
Thou therefore, O LORD God of hosts, the God of Israel, awake to visit all the heathen: be not merciful to any wicked transgressors. Selah. PSALM 59:5

I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty. REVELATION 1:8
And he said unto me, It is done. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely. REVELATION 21:6
I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last REVELATION 22:13
Saying, I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last (The highlighted is not found in the early manuscripts): and, What thou seest, write in a book, and send [it] unto the seven churches which are in Asia; unto Ephesus, and unto Smyrna, and unto Pergamos, and unto Thyatira, and unto Sardis, and unto Philadelphia, and unto Laodicea. REVELATION 1:11

WHO AND WHAT IS JESUS CHRIST?
WHILE on earth, Jesus was a human, although a perfect one because it was God who transferred the life-force of Jesus to the womb of Mary, (Matthew 1:18-25) But that is not how he began. He himself declared that he had "descended from heaven." (John 3:13) So it was only natural that he would later say to his followers: "What if you should see the Son of man [Jesus] ascends to where he was before?"John 6:62.
Thus, Jesus had an existence in heaven before coming to the earth. But was it as one of the persons in an almighty, eternal triune Godhead? No, for the Bible plainly states that in his pre-human existence, Jesus was a created spirit being, just as angels were spirit beings created by God. Neither the angels nor Jesus had existed before their creation.

Jesus, in his pre-human existence, was "the first-born of all creation." (Colossians 1:15) He was "the beginning of God's creation." (Revelation 3:14). "Beginning" [Gk. ar·khe'] cannot rightly be interpreted to mean that Jesus was the 'beginner' of God's creation. In his Bible writings, John uses various forms of the Greek word ar·khe' more than 20 times, and these always have the common meaning of "beginning." Yes, Jesus was created by God as the beginning of God's invisible creations.
Notice how closely those references to the origin of Jesus correlate with expressions uttered by the figurative "Wisdom" in the Bible book of Proverbs:

"Yahweh created me, first-fruits of his fashioning, before the oldest of his works. Before the mountains were settled, before the hills, I came to birth; before he had made the earth, the countryside, and the first elements of the world." (Proverbs 8:122225, 26,)
While the term "Wisdom" is used to personify the one whom God created, most scholars agree that it is actually a figure of speech for Jesus as a spirit creature prior to his human existence.

As "Wisdom" in his pre-human existence, Jesus goes on to say that he was "by his [God's] side, a master craftsman." (Proverbs 8:30) In harmony with this role as master craftsman, Colossians 1:16 says of Jesus that "through him God created everything in heaven and on earth."
So it was by means of this master worker, his junior partner, as it were, that the self existent God created all other things. The Bible summarizes the matter this way:
"For us there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things . . . and one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom are all things." 1 Corinthians 8:6
It no doubt was to this master craftsman that God said: "Let us make man in our image." (Genesis 1:26) Some have claimed that the "us" and "our" in this expression indicate a Trinity. But if you were to say, 'Let us make something for ourselves,' no one would normally understand this to imply that several persons are combined as one inside of you. You simply mean that two or more individuals will work together on something. So, too, when God used "us" and "our," he was simply addressing another individual, his first spirit creation, the master craftsman, the pre-human Jesus.

Jesus Christ IS A MAN! 
"For there is ONE GOD and ONE MEDIATOR of God and mankind, A MAN, Christ Jesus..." (I Tim. 2:5).
"Thou art the Christ, THE SON OF THE LIVING GOD" (Mat. 16:16).
"Christ, who is the IMAGE of the invisible God" (II Cor. 4:4).
"The Lord Jesus Christ, the SON OF THE FATHER" (II Jn 3)
"The BEGINNING of the creation of God" (Rev. 3:14 JKV)
"God’s CREATIVE ORIGINAL" (Rev. 3:14 CLNT)
"If God were your Father, you would have loved Me. For OUT OF GOD I CAME FORTH and am arriving" (John 8:42).
"Nor Jesus said to him, Why are you terming Me good? No one is good except ONE, GOD" (Mark 10:18)
(Luke 4:18 YLT) The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, Because He did anoint me; To proclaim good news to the poor, Sent me to heal the broken of heart, To proclaim to captives deliverance, And to blind receiving of sight, To send away the bruised with deliverance,”

Anointing is the giving of authority or a commission by a superior to someone who does not already have authority. Here god is plainly the superior, for he anointed Jesus, giving him authority that he did not previously have.
“Saying, Father, if thou be willing, remove this cup from me: nevertheless not my will, but thine, be done” .Luke 22:42 KJV
To whom was Jesus praying to? To a part of himself?. NO he was praying to someone superior who was and is the only one to remove the cup.

After Jesus died, he was in the tomb for three days, if he were GOD (the eternal father) then Habakkuk 1:12 is wrong when it says “O my GOD, my holy one, you do not die
“For Christ is not entered into the holy places made with hands, [which are] the figures of the true; but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us” Hebrews 9:24

If you appear in someone else’s presence how can you be that same person? You cannot. You must be different and separate.
“And he came and took the book out of the right hand of him that sat upon the throne.” Revelation 5:7
In Revelation 4:8 to 5:7 god is shown seated on his heavenly throne, but Jesus is not. He has to approach God to take a scroll from Gods right hand. This shows that Jesus is not God in heaven but separate from him.
I believe most can see from the above Scriptures that there are numerous and fundamental differences between the Father and Jesus the Son. However, there are still reasons to ask whether or not Jesus Christ, the Son of God the Father, is not also "God." Is Christ for example, not worthy our worship? Dare we worship any but "God?" And if Christ is indeed "God," why isn’t He of the very same status, rank, authority, etc., as His Father? Good questions. Let’s take them one at a time.

IS CHRIST GOD THE ALMIGHTY? YES HE IS!
"Yet to the Son [this is GOD speaking]: ‘Thy throne, O GOD, is for the eon of the eon..." (Heb. 1:8).
And also:
Who [Jesus], being inherently in the form of God, deems it not pillaging [taking by force or plundering] to be EQUAL WITH GOD" (Phil. 2:6).
Jesus IS God! True, but this fact does NOT make Him the FATHER! Let us always read and believe the Scriptures. The English word "GOD" is translated from the Greek word Theos which means placer or disposer. ANYONE to whom the Father gives such an office of "placer or disposer" is a God! Notice what God says in Psalm 82:6,
"I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High."
Jesus explains this verse for us:
"Jesus answered them, ‘Is it not written in your law, that ‘I say you are gods’? If He said those were gods, to whom the word of God came [and the scripture cannot be annulled], are you saying to Him Whom the Father hallows and dispatches into the world that You are blaspheming,’ seeing that I said, ‘Son of God am I’? If I am not doing My Father’s works, do not believe Me. Yet if I am doing them, and if ever you do not believe me, believe the works, that you may be knowing and believing that in Me is the Father, and I am in the Father."

Okay then, let’s notice a few very important points. Jesus never came out and said "I AM GOD!" He always called Himself, "The Son OF God." Recall that Jesus did not consider it "pillaging" to be equal with God. That is, he didn’t need to steal, or take His office by FORCE, because His God, the Father, gave all things to him freely! Though Jesus is certainly "God," we must always remember that everything that made Him "God" (like His Father), was given to him! Is there anyone who would suggest that someone GAVE God the Father all that He possesses? I think not. There is clearly a distinction--we have a "Father" and a "Son," NOT two equal Gods of a so-called trinity.
Notice that Jesus always acknowledges His subjection to His Father:

"Jesus, being aware that the Father has GIVEN ALL INTO HIS HANDS, and that He came out FROM God and is going away TO God" (John 13:3).
i love this scripture
"Now the Father, remaining in Me, He IS DOING HIS WORKS" (John 14:10)
"And the word which you are hearing is NOT Mine, but the Father’s Who sends me" (John 14:24).
"I am going to the Father, for THE FATHER IS GREATER THAN I" (John 14:28).
"Now, whenever all may be subjected to Him, THE SON HIMSELF ALSO SHALL BE SUBJECTED TO HIM Who subjects all to Him, that God may be ALL IN ALL" (I Cor. 15:28).

These Scriptures are clear, and there are many more like this. The Father is GREATER than His Son, and the Son will ALWAYS be subjected to His Father. They are NOT two, coequal Gods of a fabled trinity. They are “Father and Son.” They are “FAMILY!” And the “SPIRIT OF GOD is just that, the spirit OF God, not THE SPIRIT GOD,” And Jesus Christ has this SAME SPIRIT in Himself also. And it is THIS VERY SPIRIT that God the Father gives to US through His Son, Jesus Christ. It is not difficult to understand if one will simply believe the Scriptures.

Again, I want everyone to take note that when Christ speaks of the close relationship between Himself and His Father, He NEVER includes the “holy spirit” into that relationship! This is surely not an oversight on Christ’s part.
Our Lord gives us a beautiful metaphor in these same chapters of John. Jesus says:
“I am the true Grapevine, and My father is the Farmer... I am the Grapevine. You are the branches” (John 15:1 & 5).

Notice that the Holy Spirit is NO PART of this analogy. Now seriously, if the Holy Spirit were a third personality or god of the trinity, then why does it have NO PART in so many dozens and dozens of Scriptures like this one? Surely if there is a trinity, the Holy Spirit could represent maybe the soil, or the sunshine, or the rain, or at least be some part of this analogy with the Father, the Son, and the Saints, don’t you think? But no! The Holy Spirit is not mentioned. That is because it is not necessary for it to be mentioned, and also because it is not a third god of a trinity.

IS JESUS I AM THAT I AM?
At JOHN 8:58 a number of translations, for instance The Jerusalem Bible, have Jesus saying: "Before Abraham ever was, I Am." Was Jesus there teaching, as Trinitarians assert, that he was known by the title "I Am"? And, as they claim, does this mean that he was YAHWEH of the Hebrew Scriptures, since the King James Version at Exodus 3:14 states: "God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM"?
At Exodus 3:14 (KJ) the phrase "I AM" is used as a title for God to indicate that he really existed and would do what he promised.  “I will be what I will be.”
The expression at John 8:58 is quite different from the one used at Exodus 3:14. Jesus did not use it as a name or a title but as a means of explaining his pre-human existence. He was in the mind of God, he was in existence in something else.
Note how some other Bible versions render John 8:58

1869:
"From before Abraham was, I have been." The New Testament, byG. R. Noyes.
1935:
"I existed before Abraham was born!" The Bible—An American Translation, by J. M. P. Smith and E. J. Goodspeed.
1965:
"Before Abraham was born, I was already the one that I am." Das Neue Testament, by Jörg Zink.
1981:
"I was alive before Abraham was born!" The Simple English Bible.
1984:
"Before Abraham came into existence, I have been." New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures.

Thus, the real thought of the Greek used here is that God's created “firstborn,” Jesus, had existed long before Abraham was born. Colossians 1:15Proverbs 8:22, 2330Revelation 3:14. (Cross check Revelation 13:8 which speaks similar meaning, he was slain before the foundations of the earth)
Again, the context shows this to be the correct understanding. This time the Jews wanted to stone Jesus for claiming to "have seen Abraham" although, as they said, he was not yet 50 years old. (Vs. 57) Jesus' natural response was to tell the truth about his age. So he naturally told them that he "was alive before Abraham was born!"The Simple English Bible.

WHO OR WHAT IS THE HOLY SPIRIT?
In the Scriptures it is not unusual for something to be personified. Wisdom is said to have children. (Luke 7:35) Sin and death are called kings. (Romans 5:14, 21) At Genesis 4:7The Bible says: "Sin is a demon crouching at the door," personifying sin as a wicked spirit crouching at Cain's door. But, of course, sin is not a spirit person; nor does personifying the Holy Spirit make it a spirit person.
Similarly, at 1 John 5:6-8 not only the spirit but also "the water, and the blood" are said to be "witnesses." But water and blood are obviously not persons, and neither is the Holy Spirit a person.


In harmony with this is the Bible's general usage of "holy spirit" in an impersonal way, such as paralleling it with water and fire. (Matthew 3:11; Mark 1:8) People are urged to become filled with Holy Spirit instead of with wine. (Ephesians 5:18) They are spoken of as being filled with Holy Spirit in the same way they are filled with such qualities as wisdom, faith, and joy. (Acts 6:3; 11:24; 13:52) And at 2 Corinthians 6:6 Holy Spirit is included among a number of qualities. Such expressions would not be so common if the Holy Spirit were actually a person.
Then, too, while some Bible texts say that the spirit speaks; other texts show that this was actually done through humans or angels. (Matthew 10:19, 20; Acts 4:24, 25; 28:25; Hebrews 2:2) The action of the spirit in such instances is like that of radio waves transmitting messages from one person to another far away.


At Matthew 28:19 references is made to "the name . . . of the holy spirit." But the word "name" does not always mean a personal name, either in Greek or in English. When we say "in the name of the law," we are not referring to a person. We mean that which the law stands for, its authority. Robertson's Word Pictures in the New Testament says: “The use of name (onoma) here is a common one in the Septuagint and the papyri for power or authority.” So baptism “in the name of the holy spirit” recognizes the authority of the spirit, that it is from God and functions by divine will.


JESUS spoke of the Holy Spirit as a "helper," and he said it would teach, guide, and speak. (John 14:16, 26; 16:13) The Greek word he used for helper (pa·ra'kle·tos) is in the masculine gender. So when Jesus referred to what the helper would do, he used masculine personal pronouns. (John 16:7, 8) On the other hand, when the neuter Greek word for spirit (pneu'ma) is used, the neuter pronoun "it" is properly employed.
Most Trinitarian translators hide this fact, as the Catholic New American Bible admits regarding John 14:17: “The Greek word for 'Spirit' is neuter and while we use personal pronouns in English ('he,' 'his,' 'him'), most Greek MSS [manuscripts] employ 'it.'


So when the Bible uses masculine personal pronouns in connection with pa·ra'kle·tos at John 16:7, 8, it is conforming to rules of grammar, not expressing a doctrine.
The Jews never regarded the spirit as a person; nor is there any solid evidence that any Old Testament writer held this view. . . . The Holy Spirit is usually presented in the Synoptic [Gospels] and in Acts as a divine force or power.
Are we getting there?
Paul has always addressed the powers that be, other than the spirit of GOD.


“Paul, an apostle of JESUS CHRIST by the will of GOD, to the saints which are at Ephesus, and to the faithful in CHRIST JESUS: Grace be to you, and peace, from GOD OUR FATHER AND FROM THE LORD JESUS CHRIST” (Gal. 1:1-2).
But Paul never ONCE mentioned or addressed the Holy Spirit in ANY of his epistles EVER. Do you have a good explanation for such a gross omission and degradation of the Holy Spirit, if the Holy Spirit is PERSON, and VERY GOD? Well do you? No, of course you don't.

John 16:7: “It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will NOT COME UNTO YOU; but if I depart, I will SEND HIM unto you.”
Is this "comforter" the third God of a trinity? Let us see who this Comforter really is! Didn’t you ever wonder why this Comforter could not come until Christ departed? The comforter does not come until Christ departs to the Father, because the comforter IS THE SON returning in the form of "spirit," "holy spirit." Jesus is saying to him,

"I am the Way and the Truth and the Life. No one is coming to the Father except through Me" (John 14:6).
"Now, whenever the consoler [comforter] which I shall be sending you from the Father..."

Notice that Christ sends the comforter from the Father and what Jesus instructs. And notice that it does not involve a third person of a fabled trinity:

"Yet whenever that may be coming--the spirit of truth [Jesus said that HE is the Truth] it will be guiding you in to all the truth, for it will NOT be speaking from itself [it is NOT A GOD], but whatsoever it should be hearing [from Whom sent it] will it be speaking, and of what is coming will it be informing you. That will be glorifying ME, seeing that of MINE will it be getting, and informing you. All, whatever the Father has, is MINE. THEREFORE I said to you that OF MINE IS IT GETTING, AND WILL BE INFORMING YOU." (John 16:13-15).

This is not hard to understand. The spirit of Truth is ChristThe comforter is Christ.
Jesus said:                        
"I will NOT leave you bereaved [comfortless]I am coming to you [in the form of the comforter and spirit of truth]" (Jn. 14:18).
Now notice how clear Jesus makes this. Who or What is this spirit, holy spirit, holy ghost, spirit of truth, comforter? Is it really the third person of a triune God? Let Jesus Himself answer:
"IN THAT DAY [the day when the comforter comes] you shall know that I am in My Father, and you in Me, and I IN YOU" (Jn. 14:20).
"Now the consoler [comforter], THE HOLY SPIRIT, which the Father will be sending IN MY NAME, that will be teaching you all, and reminding you of all that I said to you" (Jn. 14:26).
"I am going, and I AM COMING TO YOU" (Jn. 14:27).

Jesus Christ by means of the holy spirit of God which his father gave to him is the comforter. The Greek proves that Christ is the comforter!
In the Greek, the "comforter" or consoler is translated from parakleetos as said earlier onNow, is there any Scriptural proof that Jesus Christ is called "parakleetos?" Yes there is. In 1John 2:1 we read:

"And if anyone should be sinning, we have an Entreater with the Father, Jesus Christ, the Just."

In the King James it says we have an "advocate" [with a small "a"]. King James ALWAYS capitalizes the Greek word “parakleetos," so why don’t they capitalize it here? You see, "advocate" or a better translation "Entreater" is translated from the GREEK WORD "parakleetos!"
Can we see Jesus as the "PARAKLEETOS!" now?
Isn’t this just amazing what we can learn and study well about the truth of God’s Word instead of the strange and unscriptural teaching of theologians?
To those that do not believe up to this point, there is nothing that will let u believe that God is not a trinity.

HAVE YOU THOUGHT OF THIS?
God is not "flesh." Jesus had to be "made flesh."
And then AS flesh, Jesus had to "grow and wax strong" (Luke 2:40).
God does not "grow or wax strong," but Jesus "made flesh" had to grow and wax strong.
Jesus also had to "overcome" (John 16:33).
God does not need to overcome anything.
Jesus had to "suffer" and "learn obedience" (Heb. 5:8).
God does not suffer: God does not learn anything, seeing that God is all knowing (Isa. 46:10).

Jesus was "troubled in His soul" (John 12:27).
God is never troubled in HIS soul.
Jesus got "weary" (John 4 6).
God never gets weary (Isa. 40:28).
Jesus became "exceeding sorrowful" (Matt. 26:38).
God never sorrows.
Jesus was famished after fasting for 40 days and nights. He was so "hungry" that he was ready to die (Matt. 4:2).
God never gets hungry. God can never die of hunger.
Jesus got very "thirsty" (John 19:28).
God never gets thirsty.
Jesus "wept" (John 11:35).
God never weeps.

Jesus was acquainted with "sickness" (Isa. 53:3).
God never gets sick.
How sad that many Christians believe that nothing bad ever happened to Jesus before His crucifixion.
Remember the apostles did not talk about TRINITY, they did not know anything of that sort so give it up Holy Ghost babies!!

FINALLY,
God is a title, not a name, the father of Jesus is never ever called God in the bible...No where. The word God has been used so much over the centuries that the word God has now become synonymous with the name of Jesus father.  According to the schema...God is one person but that is not true, the bible never says God is one person but it does say God is ONE for GOD is not a person but SPIRIT…Fraudulent teachers give it up

Who think the translators knew not what they were doing? They are very much aware of what they were translating; check this out Rev 13:8

According to Trinitarians, there are five texts that clearly teach that Jesus is GOD, i will just quote four of them which is
1.   Heb: 1:8-9 But about the Son he says,
     “Your throne, O God, will last for ever and ever,
and righteousness will be the scepter of your kingdom.
       You have loved righteousness and hated wickedness;
therefore God, your God, has set you above your companions
by anointing you with the oil of joy.”
  1. John 1:1 in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God,
  2. John 20:28 Thomas said to him, “My Lord and my God!”
  3. Romans 9:5Theirs are the patriarchs, and from them is traced the human ancestry of Christ, who is God over all, forever praised! Amen’.


What is your say after reading up to this stage? Do you understand these texts? As simple as ABC but does not make Jesus GOD THE FATHER.

                             
WHO IS ALMIGHTY, ALPHA AND OMEGA?
‘I am the Alpha and the Omega, says the Lord God, who is, and who was, and who is to come, the Almighty." Rev 1:8

Rev 21:6 He said to me: "It is done. I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End. To him who is thirsty I will give to drink without cost from the spring of the water of life

Now note something here...was an angel talking to John or was it Jesus or Jesus father? Think...

Rev 22:12-13 “Behold, I am coming soon! My reward is with me, and I will give to everyone according to what he has done. I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End.
Compare this text
Mat 16:27 NIV "For the Son of Man is going to come in his Father's glory with his angels, and then he will reward each person according to what he has done."
Who is the Son of man that is coming in his Father's glory? Vs 27, it is The Son of Man, (Jesus)
Almighty from the Greek word "pantokrator," which means all-ruling, Almighty, and Omnipotent. Christ is ruling the universe, and he is entitled to the TITLE Almighty GOD, the father has put his name in him.

Christ is called Almighty God but Christ does not own this title but was given to him by his father.

We can go on and on and on...but am exhausted now...

God should help us to understand



Popular Posts

EVIL IN THE BOSOM OF BENNY HINN