About Me

My photo
LONDON, CITY OF LONDON, United Kingdom
A SERVANT OF GOD, I THIRST FOR THE TRUTH THAT CHRISTENDOM HAS BURIED UNDER THE EARTH.

Sunday 28 February 2010

ETERNAL TORMENT IS A CHRISTIAN HOAX!!

WORD STUDY ON OLAM, AION AND AEON
By O. Khodjo
Welcome to mis-translations and mis-interpretations

 

INTRODUCTION

I have a standing Axiom in terms of biblical teachings, if the church teaches it then it’s false. There is not one single doctrine that the church practices that the Apostles left us. The church has had an interest in teaching “eternal” judgement. The church has depended on threats of future torment to keep its grip on its members. Eternal judgement has been the party line. All verses that contradict it have been ignored or twisted to mean something different from their obvious meaning. We are so accustomed to the lie, that we find it difficult to accept the truth.
When we study the scriptures on the final destiny of believers and unbelievers, we meet an apparent contradiction.
Some scriptures seem to say that THE ENTIRE human race will be SAVED. Consider the following:
  • ‘...God, who is the Saviour of ALL men, ESPECIALLY of believers’ (1 Tim 4: 10)
  •  “For as in Adam ALL die, so also in Christ ALL shall be made alive’ (1 Cor. 15: 22-24)
Paul here simply states that ALL die in Adam, and in Christ ALL will be made alive, though not at the same time or all in this age. Salvation is not for all in this life, but in progressive ages and stages.
  • ‘For God was pleased to have all his fullness dwell in him (Jesus), and through him to RECONCILE to himself ALL things, whether things on earth or things in heaven, by making peace through the blood of his cross.’ (Col 1: 19, 20)
Sin did separate us from GOD but now we ALL will be going back to the Father because the SON has reconciled ALL things back to the father,

Other scriptures appear to teach that unbelievers will suffer “eternal” torment.
  • ‘They will be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb. And the smoke of their torment goes up “FOR EVER” and “EVER” ...’ (Rev 14: 10, 11)
  • ‘... for whom black darkness has been reserved “FOR EVER”(Jude 13)
  • ‘Then they will go away to “ETERNAL” punishment, but the righteous to ETERNAL life’ (Mat 25: 46)
How can we reconcile this apparent contradiction in the scriptures? How can both teachings be correct?
The problem has come from the words eternity, everlasting and for ever which is translated from OLAM (Hebrew) and AION (Greek). We need to understand that, the bibles that we have now is not what the Prophets and Apostles penned down by the inspiration of the spirit of GOD. We have too many mistranslation phrases and wrong words added to the bible and too many bogus teachings from the pulpit and seminaries.
A dictionary or lexicon is not the most authoritative place to find the true definition of a word. Especially if the word in question makes or breaks a particular controversial doctrine, such as, is punishment of the wicked for a period of time that ends, or for “eternity”. 

OLAM (Hebrew) = AION (Greek) = AEON (English)...all the three mean the same thing = a period of time (long or short) And Not For Ever, Everlasting Or Eternity.
Why did the translators decided to drop aeon (the English equivalent) and rather choose to use everlasting, eternal and forever? Just to make a doctrine stand. Who wrote the dictionary and the lexicons? Is every definition in the lexicon and dictionary correct? This might be your first time hearing this, but I bet you, start checking on words in the dictionary and the lexicons now, You will find errors.
If we argue that meanings of words have changed over the years, it is true, but will that change Gods word? Nope, Never. GOD FORBIDS!!
In many Bibles the Greek word: "aion" is translated as "forever", and "aionios" is translated, "everlasting," or "eternal."  HOW PRAY TELL!!

Dr Strong's Greek Dictionary defines "aion" as follows:  "an age, perpetuity, the world, a Messianic period, course, eternal, forever, evermore, without end." Strong's defines the adjective aionios as follows: "perpetual, eternal, forever, everlasting."
Are these definitions good scholarship or religious bias? Does anyone see a problem with Dr Strong's definition of "aion/aionios?"
The fact that there may or may not be "cults" who claim that the word "olam/ aion" is mistranslated in many Bibles, has absolutely nothing to do with the validity of the argument. I personally know that "olam/ aion" is not translated properly in most places of the King James Bible, yet I am not a CULT neither a Universalist but rather hungry for the truth...some say am a pagan yet they can’t define the word paganism. The reason given as to why this word cannot be translating "everlasting" is The true test of this word’s meaning is usage and etymology (history of the word).

I will prove that it does not ever mean "without beginning or end" or "eternal" in the Scriptures. Note: When I refer to the "Scriptures," I am assuredly not referring to error-filled Bible translations of the Scriptures but the original scripts (Greek/Hebrew).
I have argued this point for the past years. Just because a word translated WRONGLY can still make sense does NOT justify doing so. Perchance someone might wish to translate Mark 9:41 as follows: "For whosoever shall give you a GLASS OF ICE COLD LEMONADE to drink in my name… shall not lose his reward." Does not the verse make equal SENSE as when it is correctly translated "A CUP OF WATER?" Yes it does, but that is NOT what the Holy Spirit inspired to be preserved for us. Hence, "a glass of ice cold lemonade" is wrong, just as translating Rom. 16:26 as "the everlasting God," is wrong. The Holy Spirit inspired the word aionios (adjective), which translated to our English equivalent "aeonian (adjective)".  The adjective is applied to some things which are ‘endless’ [as with ‘God’ in Rom. 16:26] does NOT, of course, for one moment prove that the word itself meant ‘endless’...

ETERNAL DURATION AND MODERN CONCEPTIONS

Olam and Aion denote limited duration in the holy bible. There is a verbal pivot on which swings the question, does the Bible teach the doctrine of Endless Punishment?

It does not seem to have been generally considered by students of this subject that the thought of endless duration is comparatively a modern conception. The ancients, at a time more recent than the dates of the Old Testament, had not yet recognized the idea of endless duration, so that passages containing the word applied to God do not mean that he is of eternal duration, but the idea was for the fact that GOD is immortal. Immortals live on and on but they do not define everlasting or eternity.
The pure idea of eternity is too abstract to have been conceived in the early ages of the world, and accordingly is not found expressed by any word in the ancient languages. But as cultivation advanced and this idea became more distinctly developed, it became necessary in order to express it to invent new words in a new sense. The Hebrews were destitute of any single word to express endless duration. To express a past “eternity” they said before the world was; a future, when the world shall be no more. . . . The Hebrews and other ancient people have no one word for expressing the precise idea of eternity."
THE GREEK CLASSICS
When the Old Testament was translated from Hebrew into Greek by the Seventy, the word aion had been in common use for many centuries. It is outrageous to say that the Seventy would render the Hebrew olam by the Greek aion and give to the latter
(1) a different meaning from that of the former, or
(2) A different meaning from aion in the current Greek literature. It is self-evident, then, that Aion in the Old Testament means exactly what Olam means, and also what Aion means in the Greek classics. A Period Of Time is the sense of olam, and it is equally clear that aion has a similar signification.

CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING COVENANTS

RAINBOW COVENANT                                                                                
Possibly the only truly unilateral covenant in the Bible, where absolutely no participation on our part is required for its fulfilment. Gen. 9:16,

"And the bow shall be in the cloud; and I will look upon it, that I may remember the everlasting [Heb: olam] covenant between God and every living creature of all flesh that is upon the earth."

This covenant has no requirements on our part, but is it truly everlasting—endless?
If that covenant in Gen 9:16 is everlasting, then explain the following verse
and there is  "A NEW heaven and a NEW earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were PASSED AWAY; and there was no more sea " (Rev. 21:1)
And when God says, "Behold, I make ALL THINGS NEW…." (Rev. 21:5), perhaps you can agree that this "rainbow covenant" will have come to an END, and then be of no consequence or have no application in a scriptural, heavenly realm.
A new heaven and earth replaces an old one, is the covenant still running?

ABRAHAMIC COVENANT                                                                         
Gen17:  1-2"And when Abraham was ninety years old and nine, the Lord appeared to Abram, and said unto him, I am the Almighty God; walk before Me, AND be you perfect. And I will make My covenant between Me and thee, and will multiple thee exceedingly…

7-10 And I will establish my covenant between Me and thee and your seed after you in their generations for an everlasting [Heb: olam] covenant. And I will give unto you and to your seed after you, the land wherein you are a stranger, all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting [olam] possession… This is My covenant, which ye shall keep, between Me and you and your seed after you; Every man child among you shall be CIRCUMCISED

13 He that is born in your house, and he that is bought with your money, must be circumcised: and My covenant shall be in your flesh for an everlasting [olam] covenant." (Gen. 17:1-2, 7-10, 13).

THE OLD COVENANT                                                                                             
What we term the Old Covenant obviously was not to continue "forever" or "eternally," as it was REPLACED by a NEW Covenant which was clearly stated by Paul by the divine inspiration "NOT according to the covenant that I made with their fathers…." (Heb. 8:9).
This is completely a different covenant, so how could the first covenant be termed everlasting if it has been changed, are we saying GOD lied or our translators have lied against the word of GOD? How pray tell! Grow up people!!!
How long did "EVERLASTING STATUTES" last?

Is the "everlasting statute" regulating the "day of atonement," still in force? "And this shall be an EVERLASTING [olam] statute unto you, to make atonement for the children of Israel for all their sins once a year…." (Lev. 16:34). Now compare Rom. 5:11, "And not only so, but we also joy in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, by Whom we have NOW received THE ATONEMENT."
So what do you suppose happened to that "EVERLASTING statute" regarding atonement for sin?
"But in those sacrifices there is remembrance again made of sins EVERY YEAR [on the day of ATONEMENT]… Then said He, Lo, I come to do Thy will, O God, He TAKES AWAY THE FIRST [covenant] that He may establish the second [covenant]. By the which will, we are sanctified through the OFFERING OF THE BODY OF JESUS CHRIST ONCE [no longer ‘once a year’] FOR ALL" (Heb. 10:4, 9-10).

The Levitical Priests, the offering, the temple, the holy of holies is all, GONE!. Now there is ONE ATONEMENT for all, offered ONCE and never again. This particular "eternity" lasted less than 1500 years! So just maybe an olam is NOT ETERNAL after all. What do you think? Am not being funny here, I just want you to think.
The "EVERLASTING [olam] priesthood" of Exodus 40:15. And just how long did this "everlasting priesthood" last?

"If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron? For the PRIESTHOOD BEING CHANGED, there is made of necessity a change also of the law…
For it is evident that our Lord sprang out of Judah; of which tribe Moses spake nothing concerning priesthood" (Heb. 7:11-12, 14).

And so we have no more "EVERLASTING" Levitical priesthood, but rather a CHANGE in law and a CHANGE in the priesthood. And so this "everlasting/eternity" also lasted 1500 years, and ENDED. How do we explain that?  Theologians are lying, full of errors.
I will give just one of many examples in the Old Testament where "olam" absolutely cannot mean "forever" or "eternal" as Dr. Strong so Erroneously defines it:

Exodus 21:6 "Then his master shall bring him unto the judges; he shall also bring him to the door, or unto the door post; and his master shall bore his ear through with an aul; and he shall serve him FOR EVER [Heb: ‘olam’—Strong’s ‘ETERNITY’]."

Does Dr. Strong also believe in ETERNAL SLAVERY? That is too BAD...for him being the most powerful bible concordance used worldwide...what a shame, poor scholarship.
Therefore we have just seen absolute and unarguable proof that the Hebrew olam does not and cannot possibly mean everlasting or eternal.
The concept of "eternity" is foreign to the Holy Scriptures. There is virtually nothing that is outside of the time periods known as aions. There are just a couple of hints regarding life beyond the ages of time. Luke speaks of things pertaining to the Kingdom, not coming to an end. And Paul tells us that in resurrection we will have "incorruption" and "immortality" signifying "deathlessness," but neither word has to do with time itself. Paul also speaks of a time in which God will be "ALL in all." That is the extent to which the Scriptures even hint of eternity or anything beyond the ages of time.
 In II Corinthians Paul was telling us about some eternal things, let examine this scripture:

17 For our light affliction, which is but for a moment, worketh for us a far more exceeding and eternal weight of glory;
18 While we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen: for the things which are seen are temporal; but the things which are not seen are eternal. II Cor. 4:17-18

II Cor. 4:18 is neither speaking of "deathless" or "everlasting," as some theologians suggest. It is speaking of what is happening now, in our life of flesh, and what will happen during the ages of our reign with Christ in the kingdom of God. The things of this life, we SEE daily. The things pertaining to the Kingdom of God are as yet "NOT seen." Again, it is not even speaking of what is "visible" and "Invisible," but rather what is NOW SEEN as compared with things "eonian" and NOT YET SEEN, which when seen will not be temporary, but will last through whole aeons of time. And all that is perfected through the Kingdom of God and the reign of Christ bringing all enemies into subjection, will last on PAST the aeons, and will have NO END.

The next great event in prophecy is not eternity, but rather the END of this eon and the BEGINNING of the next—the one in which the very elect will reign with Christ. There is no sense in jumping into eternity when as yet, we have numerous ages to yet live and administer God’s government and His Great Judgment. And so, what is not yet seen, is "aeonian" (pertaining to the eons), and not "eternity" as some of you, the Theologians and the King James suggests in this verse.

Paul is contrasting what is "seen" now and what is "not seen," now, but is yet future.
Not contrasting material with spiritual, but rather what is perceived in this temporary life and what is ahead as our reward in the Kingdom which is yet to come...
Paul is not speaking of spiritual things over the material world. Notice the previous verse:

17"Four our light affliction, which is but for a moment [this is temporary, and this is what Paul tells us we are NOW OBSERVING], works for us a far more exceeding and AIONIOS weight of glory."
Paul is contrasting the
[1] ‘light affliction’ with
[2] ‘Exceeding weight of glory.’
This cannot be denied, for I have just merely numbered the two contrasting points he is making. Now then, we know that the ‘light affliction’ is as he says ‘momentary’—it is SEEN, it is NOW, and it is TEMPORARY. But, he tells us that this NOW SEEN TEMPORARY affliction will bring us an EXCEEDING WEIGHT OF GLORY. WHEN? IN THE RESURRECTION, of course, the first resurrection, when we will be GLORIFIED WITH CHRIST and… and what? Why we (chosen, few, elect) are to be "kings and priests" with our Lord. When? All through ETERNITY? NO, during the "oncoming ages." These verses are speaking of the trials we now see and are enduring for a temporary moment, contrasted with the glory that will be ours IN THE KINGDOM OF GOD on this earth ruling and reign with Christ THROUGH THE AGES, not for eternity. Not even Christ rules as "King" for eternity.
Therefore aeonians means —pertaining to the oncoming AGES. Our glorious reign with Christ on the earth over the nations is for the AGES, not for eternity. The reign of Christ COMES TO AND END, just as aionios comes to an end I Cor. 15:25-26
God is NOT an "age lasting god" but rather "THE God of the ages." One has to get it through the head that a Greek "aion" is English "aeon," and a Greek "aionios" is English "aeonian." And they do not mean forever, eternity or everlasting.
Theologians normally quotes that eternity is time without end, this is NONSENSE! A blatant lie. Eternity has no beginning no end, got nothing to do with time.
In Time There Is Change
In Eternity There Is No Change,
If There Was No Sun There Would Have Been No Days(Time)
If There Was No Moon There Would Have Been No Nights(Time)
Before Creation There Was No Time
Double Check Scriptures You Will Understand This.

EXCERPTS FROM THE JEHOVAH WITNESS’S ARCHIVES
*** it-2 pp. 1102-1103 Time Indefinite ***
TIME INDEFINITE

The Hebrew word ‛oh·lam carries the thought of indefinite or uncertain time. Lexicographer Gesenius defines it as meaning “hidden time, i.e. obscure and long, of which the beginning or end is uncertain or indefinite.” (A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament, translated by E. Robinson, 1836, p. 746) Accordingly, expressions such as “time indefinite” (Ps 25:6), “indefinitely lasting” (Hab 3:6), “of old” (Ge 6:4), “a long time ago,” “of long ago” (Jos 24:2; Pr 22:28; 23:10), and “long-lasting” (Eccl. 12:5) appropriately convey the thought of the original-language term.
The word ‛oh·lam′ is at times associated with that which is everlasting. (1Ki 2:45, ftn) The prophet Isaiah wrote: “Jehovah, the Creator of the extremities of the earth, is a God to time indefinite.” (Isa 40:28) Jehovah is “from time indefinite to time indefinite.” (Ps. 90:2) Since Jehovah is immortal and does not die, he will continue to be God for all eternity. (Hab 1:12; 1Ti 1:17) However, the Hebrew expression ‛oh·lam′ does not in itself mean “forever.” It often refers to things that have an end, but the period of such things’ existence can be said to be ‘to time indefinite’ because the time of their end is not then specified.  For example, the ‘indefinitely lasting’ Law covenant came to an end with Jesus’ death and the bringing in of a new covenant. (Ex 31:16, 17; Ro 10:4; Ga 5:18; Col 2:16, 17; Heb 9:15) And the ‘indefinitely lasting’ Aaronic priesthood similarly came to an end.—Ex 40:15; Heb 7:11-24; 10:1
Another Hebrew term, ‛adh, denotes unlimited future time, everlastingness, or eternity. (1Ch 28:9; Ps 19:9; Isa 9:6; 45:17; Hab 3:6) At times, as at Psalm 45:6, the words ‛oh·lam′ and ‛adh appear together and may be rendered “age-during, and for ever” (Yg), “age-abiding and beyond” (Ro), and “time indefinite, even forever” (NW). Concerning the earth, the psalmist declared: “It will not be made to totter to time indefinite, or forever.”—Ps 104:5.
The Hebrew term ne′tsach can also denote everlastingness. From Dr strong # 5331 :( always, constantly, end, nevermore, perpetual, strength, victory
Or netsach {nay'-tsakh}; from natsach; properly, a goal, i.e. The bright object at a distance travelled towards; hence (figuratively), splendor, or (subjectively) truthfulness, or (objectively) confidence; but usually (adverbially), continually (i.e. To the most distant point of view); --alway(-s), constantly, end, (+ n-)ever(more), perpetual, strength, victory.)
Among the ways it may be rendered are “forever” (Job 4:20; 14:20), “perpetually” (Isa 57:16), and “always” (Ps 9:18). Sometimes ne′tsach and ‛oh·lam′ occur in parallel (Ps 49:8, 9), or the terms ne′tsach and ‛adh appear together. (Am 1:11) All three words are found at Psalm 9:5, 6: “You have rebuked nations . . . Their name you have wiped out to time indefinite [le‛oh·lam′], even forever [wa·‛edh′]. O you enemy, your desolations have come to their perpetual [la·ne′tsach] finish.”
In the Christian Greek Scriptures, the word ai·on′ may denote a time period of indefinite or indeterminate length, a period of remote, but not endless, time. For example, at Luke 1:70 and Acts 3:21 ai·on′ can be rendered “of old,” “of old time,” “in ancient times.” (RS, NW, AT) Often, however, the context suggests that ai·on′ is to be understood to refer to a time period of undefined length because of such period being endless in duration. (Lu 1:55; Joh 6:50, 51; 12:34; 1Jo 2:17) Similarly, the adjective ai·o′ni·os (drawn from ai·on′) can, as is evident from the context, signify both “long lasting” (Ro 16:25; 2Ti 1:9; Tit 1:2) and “everlasting.” (Mt 18:8; 19:16, 29) Another Greek adjective, a·i′di·os, specifically means “eternal” or “everlasting.”—Ro 1:20; Jude 6, NW, RS, AT; for a further consideration of ai·on′,

The Greek “Aion.” “Age” may also refer to a period of time in man’s history, whether having or not having datable bounds. It is frequently used to translate the Greek word ai·on′ (plural, ai·o′nes) in some translations.
Greek lexicographers show the word to mean “space of time clearly defined and marked out, epoch, age,” and also “lifetime, life,” or “age, generation.” Since an epoch, or age, can begin and end or IT CAN GO ON FOREVER, it follows that ai·on′ could refer to a period of time that is endless, though having a beginning. (This whole explanation is nonsense and contradictory) bold writings are mine.
Thus, as recorded at Mark 3:29, Jesus said that the blasphemer against the holy spirit was guilty of “everlasting [agelong, perpetual, eternal] sin,” or a sin never to be cancelled out at any future time (THIS IS NEVER TRUE, IT’S ONLY FOR THE AEONS) bold comments are mine. A similar expression was used with regard to the fruitless fig tree, where “forever” in the Greek is literally “to [for] the age.” (Mt 21:19) At Jesus’ birth the angelic promise was that “he will rule as king over the house of Jacob FOREVER [literally, into the ages].”—Luke 1:33 (JESUS NEVER RULES FOREVER, THE PROPER WORDS SHOULD HAVE BEEN INTO THE AGES (a period of time), because he hands over the kingdom to the father who sent him after destroying the last enemy, DEATH. God then becomes king 1 Cor. 15 :24 - 28) bold writings are mine
However, ai·on′ can also refer more particularly to the consistent state of things or the current state of affairs or features that distinguish a certain period of time, epoch, or age rather than to the matter of time itself
In the Hebrew Scriptures. The Hebrew term che′ledh is similar in meaning to ai·on′, referring in some texts to “life’s duration” (Job 11:17; Ps 39:5; 89:47), but in other cases the features of the time period appear to be the main thing signified, allowing for rendering it “system of things.” (Ps 17:13, 14; 49:1) Some translations use the word “world” to render this term in these latter texts, but this rendering more or less bypasses the sense implied, namely, that of continuing time.
*** w96 4/1 pp. 10-15 Praise the King of Eternity! ***

“Jehovah is King to time indefinite, even forever.”—PSALM 10:16.
ETERNITY—what would you say it is? Do you think time could really go on forever? Well, there is no question that time stretches forever into the past. So why not forever into the future? (NONSENSE, TIME IS GOT NOTHING TO DO WITH ETERNITY) bold writings are mine. Indeed, the New World Translation of the Bible refers to God as being praised “from time indefinite even to time indefinite.” (Psalm 41:13). (THIS IS TRUE BECAUSE GOD STARTED RECEIVING PRAISES WHEN HE CREATED THE ANGELS, BEFORE THAT THERE WAS NO PRAISES) bold writings are mine
I can go on and on and on from the Jehovah witness archives but there is no need.
End Of Jehovah Witnesses Archives...

     KING JAMES Vs. NEW WORLD TRANSLATION
The New World Translation (which is the Jehovah’s Witnesses’ Bible) DOES translate "aionion" (albeit erroneously) as "everlasting—"…in accord with the commandment of the EVERLASTING God…." (Rom. 16:25, New World Translation). Yet they still argue this out as correctly translated likewise all Christendom.

Let’s compare the following verse from two popular archrivals in Christendom...
"And these will depart into Everlasting CUTTING-OFF, but the righteous ones into EVERLASTING life" (Matt. 25:46, New World Translation of Jehovah’s Witnesses).
“And these shall go away into Everlasting PUNISHMENT: but the righteous into life ETERNAL (Matt. 25:46, King James Version)

The word translated cutting off by JW and Punishment by KJV is a Greek word “Kolasin” which means cutting off and NOT punishment...
This verse has many problems. The JW’s followed the error of the KJV with reference to "aionio.”. Actually the New World Translation (JW) translated “kolasin” correctly than KJV, because the word is not "punishment." The Greek word "kolasin" comes from "kolazo" and it means to "cut off" or to "prune." Since the New World Translation knew to properly translate this word "cutting off," it is remarkable that they still erred and translated "aionio" as everlasting, hence: "everlasting cutting-off." Pruning is administered to INCREASE LIFE AND PRODUCTION. They should have seen by this alone that this "pruning" could not be "everlasting.” JW on this subject is far better than KJV. So stop calling the Jehovah witness as a false religion, prove yourself right with your own error filled King James.

Bear in mind that the proper translation of the word "punishment" is used but one time only in the New Testament with reference to sinners, and that is in Heb. 10:29  Of how much sorer PUNISHMENT, suppose ye, ...”
Dr Strong # 5098 Gk=timoria From timoreo ; means vindication, i.e. a penalty -- punishment.  
And nowhere else in the entire New Testament! Yes nowhere else unless is a wrong translation.
The word "kolasin" is better translated "chastening" which agrees with pruning or cutting off and not punishment. And "aionio (Greek)" mean "aeonian (English)"—pertaining to the aions, hence "chastening aeonian" is the proper translation. And "life aeonian" is also proper. Hence both times "aionio" is aeonian and not eternal. The life that is promised to the elect who overcome is life for the aeons—"aeonian life." They are promised ruler ship with Jesus on this earth over the nations, Rev. 2:26. They are NOT promised ruler ship over the nations for all eternity, as not even Christ Himself rules over the nations eternally:

24 Then the END WILL COME, when he HANDS OVER THE KINGDOM TO GOD the Father after he has destroyed all dominion, authority and power. 25 For he must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet. 26 THE LAST ENEMY TO BE DESTROYED IS DEATH. 27 For he “has put everything under his feet.” Now when it says that “everything” has been put under him, it is clear that this does not include God himself, who put everything under Christ. 28 When he has done this, then the Son himself will be made subject to him who put everything under him, so that God may be ALL in ALL.  (I Cor. 15:24-28 NIV)

The Elect will reign and JUDGE the nations not only through the millennium, but also for the whole period of the Great White Throne/Lake of fire/Second death judgment.
And AFTER the consummation of the ages, the elect saints continue to live, not because they were promised "eternal" life, but because they have been resurrected from the dead or changed at our Lord’s coming, hence they are all given IMMORTALITY! Which means that they will NEVER EVER die, even though they have never been promised "eternal" life by such a name or term,
The Scriptural fact that God is an "aionios [aeonian] God" in no way suggests that God lives only for the period covered by the word "aionios." That is unjustifiable speculation based on false deductions from a false premise. This reasoning is so silly that it hardly deserves comment.

In Gen. 24:3 we read that God is the "God of the earth." Now the earth is visible; is God therefore visible? No. The earth is physical; is God therefore physical? No. The earth will pass away (Matt. 24:35); does this mean that God too will "pass away," since He is the "God" of this "visible, material, passing away" earth? NO. Pretty silly huh?
Now for one of the most important truths of all regarding this word "aionios." When God says that He is "the AEONIAN God," He is stating a FACT. That Jesus procured "AEONIAN redemption" for us, is a statement of FACT. Neither "aeonian God" nor "aeonian redemption" are statements of LIMITATION. And to suggest that they are statements of limitation is to pervert the Scriptures—they neither say nor insinuate any such thing.

This principle of stating a FACT, which is not a statement of LIMITATION, is found throughout the Scriptures. God is for example: "The God OF Abraham, OF Isaac, and OF Jacob" (Ex. 3:6). This is a statement of FACT. It is not a statement of LIMITATION. This statement of fact does not limit God from also being the God of Moses, David, Peter and Paul.
If the statement said that God is the "God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob ONLY," then it would be a statement of limitation, but we don’t find any such words of limitation in the verses in question. It doesn’t say that God is the "eonian God, ONLY," or that Jesus procured "eonian redemption ONLY" for us. Does it?

I have no problem with the fact that "immortality" is practically "eternal." That is, those with immortality live eternally. But that is NOT what the words themselves mean. Eternal does not MEAN immortality anymore than immortality means eternal.
Let’s have a little common sense and wisdom regarding this matter. It is senseless to state that "God is eternal." The very fact OF God is proof in itself that God IS eternal. We do not speak of "wet rain," do we? We do not say: "It’s raining WET rain." The very fact OF rain assumes that it is WET. The writers of Scripture had NO WORD in their vocabulary which could be defined as "endless time." But they DID have a word that signified "no death." Immortality means DEATH=LESS=NESS, not eternal or eternity.


The word "eternal" comes from the Latin "aeternum" which in the first century meant virtually the same as the word "seculum," and in fact, Saint Jerome(one of the first to translate the bible into latin---the now vulgate) sometimes rendered "aion" aeternus, and in other places he renders "aion" as seculum. They were considered virtually synonyms. Here is how the Latin dictionaries define, seculum—"a generation, an age, the world, the times, the SPIRIT OF THE TIMES, and a period of a hundred years."


Jesus doesn’t reign over ANYONE "forever." That is not a translation, but an interpretation. If Jesus reigns "forever," then Paul lied in I Cor. 15:25 where he tells us that Jesus rules ONLY UNTIL He puts down all enemies. He then TURNS OVER THE KINGDOM TO HIS GOD AND FATHER. He STOPS reigning. His "eternal" reign COMES TO AN END, because His reign is "aionion" and not "eternal."
The kingdom does continue; it is endless. However, Jesus as "King" of this kingdom is "eonian" and NOT ENDLESS, as we have clearly seen from I Cor. 15:24-25.
Some argue that "Aeon" in the singular means "age," but in the plural it means "forever" or "eternal." Let’s see how the Greek Septuagint uses both the singular and plural forms in these two verses"
Singular: Micah 4:5—"ets ton aiona kai epekeina….for the eon and BEYOND." Well that can’t possibly mean forever for eternal, as there can be nothing "beyond" eternity.
I hope my readers got that?? Read it again and again and again!!!
Plural: Dan. 12:3—"eis tous aionas kai eti….for the eons and LONGER." Once again, there can be nothing "longer" than eternity Besides, how is it possible to have a plurality of "eternities?" how pray tell?


Here are just a few scriptures in which "aionios" cannot possibly mean eternal:

1. Rom. 16:25—"…according to the revelation of the mystery, which was kept secret since the world [Gk: aionios] began." Well check this bit of translating genius out. We have the ADJECTIVE word "aionios" and the KJV translators changed it to a NOUN, "world."
The word "world" (kosmos) is not found in this verse; furthermore, neither is the word "began." The Greek reads: "…in times aeonian." Do we really believe in "times eternal." What does "time," let alone "times" have to do with "eternity?" And as Paul speaks of the "revelation" of this secret, how could it EVER be revealed if it was kept secret ‘ETERNALLY?’ Do you not see a problem—a CONTRADICTION in all of this? NONSENSE! - remember that eternity has got nothing to do with time.

2. II Thes. 2:16—"…and has given us everlasting consolation and good hope through grace." "Console" is defined as, "To calm (allay) sorrow or grief of." "Hope" is defined as, "To wish for something with expectations of its fulfilment." Now then, according to this inane (silly) KJV translation of this verse, just how long are we going to have our "Sorrow And Grief Allayed?" How long must we "HOPE" before we have our hope fulfilled? For ALL ETERNITY? Nonsense.

3. II Tim. 1:9—"…according to His own purpose and grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus before the world began." The word "world" is not found in the Greek manuscripts, the word "began" is not found in the Greek manuscripts. Here is what the Greek says: "…before TIMES AEONIAN." So where is the consistency with these translators? Could they not deceive the readers by translating this verse properly? If "aionios" means "eternal" or "evermore" then HOW pray tell, can there be "TIMES" before "ETERNITY?" Give me a break. This is not translating; this is out and out planned deception! They change an adjective into a noun, then change the noun to a different word, then completely leave out the word "times." This total lack of scholarship and honesty is reprehensible!

4. Jude 7—"Even as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire." The Greek reads: "…experiencing the justice of fire aeonian." Well just how long does this "aeonian/aionios fire last? Is it really "eternal" as the Authorized Version and Christendom, contend?
A. There is NO FIRE burning in Palestine since the days of Sodom anywhere, let alone in the vicinity of these ancient cities. The best archaeologists can discern that Sodom is located at the bottom of what is now a sea.
B. Ezekiel 16:55—"When your sisters, SODOM and her daughters, shall RETURN TO THEIR FORMER ESTATE, and Samaria and her daughters shall return to their former estate, then you [Jerusalem] shall return to your former estate."
The judgment of God against Sodom was decidedly not, ETERNAL. Here is clear Scriptural evidence and proof that "olam/aion/aionios," etc., DO NOT MEAN ETERNAL OR ENDLESS TIME. Give it up, The doctrine of "eternal torture" is the most evil doctrine, teaching, or concept ever invented in the history of the universe. It is the MOST blasphemous thing that could ever be attributed to our Lord and Father. Give it up!

AEONS OR FOREVER
It never ceases to amaze me that words (most words in most languages) have fairly precise and restricted meanings until these same words are used in religion, where they apparently lose all logic and preciseness of meaning.
I have proven beyond what you can ever imagine that aeons cannot be for ever ...
See Its Simplicity:
There was a time before God made any eons (I Cor. 2:7).
Then God made the eons (Heb. 1:2).
There were eons in the past (Col 1:26).
We are living in this present wicked eon (Gal. 1:4).
Satan is the god of this eon (II Cor. 4:4).
Christ, not Satan, will reign a thousand years in the next eon (Luke 1:33).
The thousand years will come to an end (Rev. 20:3).
Christ will reign in the eon that follows the thousand years (Rev. 22:5 and Luke. 1:33). Hence, He reigns for the "eons" (the next two) "of the eons" (all others).
Then the last eon comes to an end (I Cor. 10:11).
Christ ceases to reign after the eons come to an end (I Cor. 15:24:28) because He turns over the Kingdom to God His Father and God becomes "all in all."
The eons end, but that which is of the Kingdom continues (Luke 1:33 & Isa. 9:7). We all continue "living" after the eons because, just like God, we will then all have been given immortality the scripture that says we are god becomes valid, grow up people!!
There is not one word in either the Hebrew or Greek Scriptures that can be properly translated "forever" or "eternity," or any other word meaning "endless" time. Some might suggest that a verse such as Rom. 16:26-- " ... the everlasting [Gk: 'aionian'] God" proves that aionian is eternal. It does not. Paul isn't trying to tell us here that God lives "for ever." The Scriptures have long ago told us that God's life has no end (Psalm 102:27). Paul is telling us that God is not off in a corner somewhere unconcerned with mankind, but that He is " ... the eonian God." That is, He is God of the eons in which we live (Rev. 15:8). This does not say God ceases to exist at the end of the eons any more than Christ ceases to exist after He is no longer "King of the eons (Rev. 5:3)."
When there are no more eons, Christ ceases to be the King of the eons (I Cor. 15:24). He certainly doesn't cease to exist. When the eons end (and they all will), then God will be the same God He has always been.
We must be given immortality (I Cor. 15:53-54). Believers are promised "eonian life" so they are given "immortality," which sees them through and beyond eonian life. Unbelievers are NOT given "eonian life" or "immortality" at the same time as believers are. Hence they can die in the second death. However, after the eons end, they too, (all unsaved from Adam on) are "vivified" [Greek: zoopoieo] (LIVE-DO)--given life beyond the reach of death. This confers immortality (John 5:21-22, Rom. 4:17, I Tim. 6:13).

Read I Cor. 15:22-28."For even as in Adam, all are dying, thus also, in Christ, shall all (this is the same "all" used both times) be vivified..."
There is a "class" or "order" to the vivification of all. First Christ, Second those who are Christ's in His presence, Third the consummation. Christ reigns only until He nullifies all sovereignty and all authority and power, and has placed all enemies under His feet. The last enemy being abolished is death. Then Christ Himself gives up the kingdom to His Father and becomes subject to His Father and God becomes " ... ALL IN ALL."

Why are we being selective of words? is all because of fraudulent theologians TIME has become ETERNITY and Christendom has been brainwash with it and all follows the error.

It's just like most other basic truths of Scripture: they don't fit into Christian theology.
Obviously, the Satanic teaching that God Almighty (full of mercy, love and grace) will torture anyone endlessly (let alone the vast majority of humanity), is nowhere taught or even hinted at anywhere in Scripture.
I am not just saying that, in my opinion, "aion" should not be translated "eternal." I am saying "aion" cannot be translated "eternal"!
I prepared a chart below to show key verses on the aions from my research work. The Greek word "aion" is here translated properly and consistently by two different translations. Notice carefully the categories these verses fall into: BEFORE, MAKES, PAST, PRESENT, END, NEXT, FUTURE, CONTRASTING, AND ENDS. It is not possible to use any one of these words in conjunction with any word meaning "endless time" or "eternity."



   CONCORDANT VERSION
   ROTHERHAM (1896)
BEFORE the aions:
I Cor. 2:7--
       ... before the eons ...
   ... before the ages...

God MAKES the aions

Heb. 1:2--
      
      ... makes the eons.
  
   ... made the ages.

PAST aions:

Col. 1:26--
      
      ... hid from eons...

  ... from the ages ...

PRESENT aion:

Gal. 1:4---
      
     ... the present wicked     eon ...

  ... present age ... an evil one

END of present aion:

Mat. 24:3--

    ... conclusion of the eon ...

... conclusion of the age...

The NEXT aion:

Lk. 18;30--

    ... the eon to come ...

... age that is coming ...
FUTURE aions:
Eph. 2:7--
   ... the oncoming eons ...
... ages that should come ...

CONTRASTING aions:
Eph. 3:21--
   ... the eon of the eons...
... age of the ages ...

ENDS of the aions:

I Cor.10:11-

   ... the consummations of the eons ...

  ... the ends of the ages ...
Now try substituting the words "eternity," "forever," or "everlasting" in place of eon or age and see what happens: "before the eternities," "the present wicked eternity," "the conclusion of the everlasting," "the oncoming forever’s," "the eternity of the eternities," "the consummation of the forever’s." Interestingly
Only a few translations render "aion" consistently. These translations are not popular, however, because they are not endorsed by mainstream clergy. Most people have never even seen these translations. What they do see are the numerous popular translations that promote error upon error. I prepared a chart of popular translations showing the extreme measures taken to pervert this simple Greek word, "aion."

THE GREEK TEXT
(This makes perfect sense)
    POPULAR TRANSLATIONS
                     (This is nonsense)
Mat. 13:22
" ... the worry of this eon ... "
“... the cares of life... "
(The Twentieth Century N.T.)
18:8
“... eonian fire."
“... everlasting fire."
(Authorized King James Version)
24:3
“... conclusion of the eon."
“... the world will come to an end."
(N.T. By: WmBeck)
28:20
“... till the conclusion of the eon."
“... every day to the end of time.
(Rieu's Four Gospels)
Mark 4:19
“... worries of this eon..."
“... but worldly cares ... "
(New English Bible: N.T.)
Luke 20:35
“... that eon... "
" ... yonder world ... "
(N.T.: A New Testament-Moffatt)
John 6:54
" ... has life eonian ...”
“... will live eternally ... "
(N.T. By: Monsignor Knox)
8:35
" ... for the eon ... "
" ... remain permanently ... "
(N.T. by: Montgomery)
8:35
" ... for the eon ... "
" ... in the house for ever ... "
(Authorized King James Version)
8:51
“... death for the eon... "
" ... will never experience death ... "
(N.T. by: Goodspeed)
Acts 3:31
" ... from the eon ... "
“... from of old.."
(Revised Standard Version)
I Cor 2:7
" ... before the eons ... "
" ... before time began ... "
(New Testament by: O.Norlie)
8:13
" ... eating meat for the eon ... "
“... from flesh meat perpetually ..."
(N. T. By: Knox)
8:13
" ... eating meat for the eon ... "
" ... while the world stands ... "
(Authorized King James Version)
Eph. 3:9
" ... from the eons ... "
" ... from the very beginning ... "
(Living Gospels-Taylor)
3:11
" ... purpose of the eons ... "
" ... that timeless purpose ... "
(N.T. by: J.B. Phillips)
3:21
“... of the eon of the eons."
“... all ages, world without end."
(Authorized King James Version)
Col. 1:26
" ... from the eons ... "
“... for centuries... "
(Paraphrased Epistles-Taylor)
Titus 2:12
" ... in the current eon ... "
“... here and now ... "
(New Testament-J. B. Phillips)
Heb. 1:2
" ... makes the eons ... "
" ... made the universe ... "
(Epistles of Paul-Conybeare)
1:2
" ... makes the eons ... "
" ... created all orders of existence ... "
(New Eng. Bible)
1:2
" ... makes the eons ... "
“... this world of time ... "
(N.T. By: Monsignor Knox)
1:8
" ... for the eon of the eon ... "
" ... from everlasting to everlasting ... "
(N.T.-Norlie)
6:5
" ... the impending eon ... "
" ... the eternal world ... "
(N.T. by: J.B. Phillips)
6:20
" ... for the eon ... "
“... made for all time ... "
(Twentieth Century N.T.)
9:26
" ... conclusion of the eons ... "
" ... at the climax of history ... "
(New Eng. Bible)
11:3
" ... eons to adjust ... "
" ... the whole scheme of time and space ... "
(Phillips)
II Pet. 3:18
" ... for the day of the eon ... "
" ... the day of eternity ... "
(N.T. by: R.F. Weymouth)
Jude 25
" ... eon, now ... for all the eons ... "
" ... before all time, ... and for ever more ... "
(ASV)
Rev. 15:3
" ... King of the eons ... "
" ... King of the nations ... "
(N.T. By; Henry Alford)
5:13
" ... for the eons of the eons ... "
*" ... the eternities of the eternities... "
(Amplified N.T)
“... the eternities of the eternities ... " Now there's a strange rendering. I nonetheless give the translator credit for his stupid consistency. If aion means "eternity" then aions would mean "eternities." If someone can explain to me the meaning of "the eternities of the eternities".

So how did the translators handle a verse like Matt. 24:3, “... conclusion of the eon ...?" Remember they insist in other places that "aion" is "forever," and now they have to translate a verse claiming that this particular eon is going to end. How can forever "end?" Being in a fix, the translators changed the meaning of "aion" again, and translated this verse “... end of the world ...” Now, think for a moment. Since they insist elsewhere that "aion" means "eternal" (which of course it doesn't), how could it possibly mean "world" here? It couldn't. The Greek word for world is "kosmos" not "aion." Do you want to be among the fooled?
Check enough English Translations, and you will find all of the following diverse words absurdly translated from the Greek word "aion:" I think we are learning something good fella’s.
"beginning" and "end"
"first" and "very first"
"evermore" and "nevermore"
"before time began" and "end of time"
"of old" and "today"
"nations" and "saints"
"permanently" and "never while the world lasts"
"the world" and "the universe"
"for all time" and "before all time"
"ancient" and "here and now"
"immortal" and "never to the end of my days"
"end of the world" and "world without end"
"ancient" and "yonder world"
"always" and "never"
You are looking at an amazing thing, which is false translating in action. This is certainly not "a pattern of sound words" (II Tim. 1:13-14)!
Who would ever condone such a butchering of God's Word, Who? Most of the world's theologians and clergy, that's who, Not only do they condone it, but they endorse it, Nonsense!
The word "eternal" was completely unknown (in any of the old English Bibles), before the Renaissance.
Psa. 73:12--"Behold, these are the ungodly, who prosper in the WORLD; they increase in riches."
The word translated "world" is olam which they translate "everlasting" in dozens of other places. Clearly the "ungodly" do not prosper for "eternity" or "everlasting." Who are they deceiving?
The Hebrew and Greek Languages had no word that meant "endless time" or "eternity." And further, no one has ever found such a word in ANY LANGUAGE before the second century to denote "endless time" or "eternity."
The facts regarding the temporary duration of the eons are contained in the Scriptures themselves. This demolishes the eternal torment in “Hell” heresy. Preachers love this eternal torment that’s why they are refusing to see the truth.
Adding a word so enormous as "endless" to a word that in no way means endless, is a gross infraction of Christ's warning about "adding to" God's word (Rev. 22:18).

LETS CONSIDER SOME SCHOLARS ON THIS ISSUE
Who cares that the "secular Greek-English lexicon by Bauer" defines aionios as without beginning or end and eternal? Does that mean that we should pick up our tents and go home? Should we burn all the other lexicons and dictionaries on our book shelves that teach contrary, because "Bauer has spoken?" If a dictionary definition carries weight on this matter, then consider some real scholars on the subject:

Dr. Marvin Vincent, Word Studies of the New Testament (Vol. IV, p. 59). The adjective aionios in like manner carries the idea of time. Neither the noun nor the adjective in them carries the sense of "endless" or "everlasting.’ Aionios means enduring through or pertaining to a period of time.

Elliot’s Commentary on the Whole Bible (Matt. 25:46). Everlasting punishment--life eternal. The two adjectives represent the same Greek word, aionios—it must be admitted that the Greek word which is rendered "eternal" does not, in itself, involve endlessness, but rather, duration, whether through an age or succession of ages, and that it is therefore applied in the N.T. to periods of time that have had both a beginning and ending (Rom. 16:25).

An Alphabetical Analysis by Charles H. Welch (Editor of The Berean Expositor and a man well versed in Greek), (Vol. 1, p. 279), "Eternity is not a Biblical theme." (Vol. 1, p. 52), "What we have to learn is that the Bible does not speak of eternity. It is not written to tell us of eternity. Such a consideration is entirely outside the scope of revelation." 

The chronoios aioniois moreover, are not to be thought of as stretching backward everlastingly, as it is proved by the pro chronon aionion of II Tim. 1:9; Titus. 1:2. (Note: pro chronon aionion means "BEFORE times eonian." Since this Scripture tells us that there was time "before" eonian, eonian cannot possibly mean eternal, for nothing can be "before" eternity.)

The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible (vol. IV, p. 643): Time: The O.T. and the N.T. are not acquainted with the conception of eternity as timelessness. The O.T. has not developed a special term for "eternity." The word aion originally meant "vital force," "life," "age," "lifetime."

The large Catholic Bible dictionary, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Bible (p. 693): ETERNITY: The Bible hardly speaks of eternity in the philosophical sense of infinite duration without beginning or end. The Hebrew word olam, which is used alone (Ps. 61:8; etc.) or with various prepositions (Gen. 3:22; etc.) in contexts where it is traditionally translated as ‘forever,’ means in itself no more than ‘for an indefinitely long period."  Olam does not mean ‘from eternity’ but ‘of old’ Gen. 6:4; etc.). In the N.T. aion is used as the equivalent of olam. (Note: even the Catholic translators of The Jerusalem Bible and The New American Bible have failed to heed the scholarship of their own Catholic authorities.)

Dr. R. F. Weymouth, a translator who was adept in Greek, states in The New Testament in Modern Speech (p. 657), Eternal, Greek aionion, i.e., of the ages: Etymologically this adjective, like others similarly formed does not signify, "during" but "belonging to" the aions or ages.

The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible, (Vol. 4, p. 641), "The O.T. and the N.T. are not acquainted with the concept of eternity as timelessness. “Page 655: "The O.T. has not developed a special term for eternity. " Page 645: "The use of the word aion in the N.T. is determined very much by the O.T. and the LXX (Septuagint). Aion means long, distant, uninterrupted time. The intensifying plural occurs frequently in the N.T. but it adds no new meaning."

Hasting’s Dictionary of the New Testament (Vol. I, p. 542, art. Christ and the Gospels): Eternity. There is no word either in the O.T. Hebrew or the N.T. Greek to express the abstract idea of eternity. (Vol. III, p. 369): Eternal, everlasting—nonetheless "eternal" is misleading, inasmuch as it has come in the English to connote the idea of "endlessly existing," and thus to be practically a synonym for "everlasting." But this is not an adequate rendering of aionios which varies in meaning with the variations of the noun aion from which it comes. (p. 370):

Dr. Edward Plumptre, an eschatologist, "I fail to find, as is used by the Greek Fathers, any instance in which the idea of time duration is unlimited."

Time and Eternity by G. T. Stevenson, (p. 63), "Since, as we have seen, the noun aion refers to a period of time it appears, very improbable that the derived adjective aionios would indicate infinite duration, nor have we found any evidence in Greek writing to show that such a concept was expressed by this term."

Professor Herman Oldhausen, German Lutheran theologian, "The Bible has no expression for Endlessness. All the Biblical terms imply or denote long periods."

Professor Knappe of Halle wrote, "The Hebrew was destitute of any single word to express endless duration. The pure idea of eternity is NOT FOUND IN ANY OF THE ANCIENT LANGUAGES."

The Complete Works of Falvius Josephus. Josephus obviously did not consider aionios to be "everlasting," seeing that he uses the word to represent the period of time between the giving of the law of Moses and that of his own writing [clearly not an eternity]. He also assigns aionios to the period of imprisonment of the tyrant John by the Romans [clearly he was not imprisoned for an eternity], and also for the period during which Herod’s temple stood [since Herod’s temple was not even standing at the time Josephus wrote, it too proves that Josephus did not mean ‘eternity’ when he wrote ‘aionios’].
Saint Gregory of Nyssa speaks of aionios diastema, "an aeonian interval." How many intervals do you know of that are "endless" or "eternal?"

Saint Chrysostum, in his homily on Eph. 2:1-3, says that, "Satan’s kingdom is aeonian; that is, it will cease with the present world."

Saint Justin Martyr, in the Apol. (p. 57), used the word aionios repeatedly: aionion kolasin…all ouchi chiliontaete periodon, "eonian chastening but a period, not a thousand years," or as some translate this clause "but a period of a thousand years only." Hence, to Justin Martyr, aionios was certainly not "endless."

In Dr. Farrar’s book, Mercy and Judgment, (p. 378), "Since aion meant ‘age,’ aionios means, properly, ‘belonging to an age,’ or ‘age-long,’ and anyone who asserts that it must mean ‘endless’ defends a position which even Augustine practically abandoned twelve centuries ago. Even if aion always meant ‘eternity,’ which is not the case in classic or Hellenistic Greek—aionios could still mean only belonging to eternity’ and not lasting through it."

Dr. F. W. Farrar, author of The Life of Christ and The Life and Word of St. Paul, as well as books about Greek grammar and syntax, writes in The Eternal Hope (p. 198), "That the adjective is applied to some things which are ‘endless’ does not, of course, for one moment prove that the word itself meant ‘endless;’ and to introduce this rendering into many passages would be utterly impossible and absurd."
Etc..etc.....

TIME Vs. ETERNITY
Picture yourself being burned and tortured without relief and without any hope for trillions of centuries. Well, of course, we humanly cannot imagine such torture or such a long period of time-our minds and our emotions are incapable of it. If any sane Christian could witness, even for a few hours or a few days, the kind of hideous torture presented by Christian doctrine, I believe he would seriously reconsider whether a loving God is capable of such sadistic punishment. But consider a trillion centuries of such torture? For WHAT? Who is appreciating or benefiting from the spectre of such a hell hole of misery, pain, sorrow, and total despair? God the Father? Christ Jesus? The Saints? The heavenly Host?

This may be the “god” of Christendom, but I assure you it is NOT the All Wise, All Knowing, All Merciful, All Loving, All Saving, and ALMIGHTY GOD, of the Holy Scriptures! Christendom is fast becoming the dominant religion of the world. We only need to consult God's Word to see who is "the god of this world" (II Cor. 4:4), and we will know who it is that rules over these world-deceiving religions. " ... the ancient serpent called Adversary and Satan, who is deceiving the WHOLE INHABITED EARTH" (Rev. 12:9). "For such are FALSE APOSTLES, fraudulent workers, being transfigured into APOSTLES OF CHRIST.  And no marvel, for Satan himself is being transfigured into a MESSENGER OF LIGHT [not a red, hoofed monster with horns and a pitchfork]. It is no great thing, then, if his servants also are being transfigured as DISPENSERS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS-whose consummation shall be according to their acts" (II Cor. 11:13-15)!
I apologize for highly understating my feelings on this despicable teaching.

THE REAL GOSPEL OF JESUS CHRIST OUR LORD
Unfortunately, most have never heard this verse correctly translated, most do not teach it, most do not believe it:
 “... yet God is commending this love of His to us, seeing that, while we are still sinners, Christ died for our sakes. Much rather, then, being now justified in His blood, we shall be saved from indignation, through Him. For if, being enemies, we were conciliated to God through the death of His son, much rather, being conciliated, we shall be saved in His life" (Rom. 5:8-11).

For reconciliation to take place one party must be conciliated to a second party and the second party must be conciliated back to the first party. Then, and only then, is there reconciliation. God is now conciliated [Gk: katalla'sso = DOWN-CHANGE] to the world because of His Son's sacrifice, and the world will one day be reconciled [Gk: apokatalla'sso = FROM-DOWN-CHANGE] to God! Conciliation has to do with one side only in an estrangement, whereas reconciliation has to do with both sides of an estrangement. The Authorized Version does not make this vital distinction in the Greek Text!
Here is how God does it:

"Consequently, then, as it was through one offense for all mankind for condemnation, thus also it is through one just award for all mankind for life's justifying For even as, through the disobedience of the one man [Adam], the many were constituted sinners, thus also, through the obedience of the One [Christ], the many shall be constituted just" (Rom. 5:18-19).

That verse summarizes the who, what, when, where, why, and how of the Gospel.
Although God is now conciliated to mankind because of Christ's sacrifice on Calvary, will mankind ever be conciliated to God, thus bringing about full reconciliation? Absolutely:

"For He is our Peace, Who makes both one [Jews and Gentiles-that's all the people there are in the whole world], and razes the central wall of the barrier (the enmity in His flesh), nullifying the law of precepts in decrees, that He should be creating the two[both Jews and Gentiles], in Himself, into one new humanity, making peace; and should be reconciling both in one body to God, through the cross, killing the enmity in it" (Eph. 2:14-16).

Second witness: Christ
"Who is the Image of the invisible God, Firstborn of every creature, for in Him is all created, that in the heavens and that on the earth, the visible and the invisible, whether thrones, or lordships, or sovereignties, or authorities, all is created through Him and for Him, and He is before all, and all has it cohesion in Him. And He is the Head of the body, the ecclesia, Who is Sovereign, Firstborn from among the dead, that in all He may be becoming first, for in Him the entire complement delights to dwell, and through Him to reconcile all to Him (making peace through the blood of His cross, through Him, whether those on the earth or those in the heavens" (Col. 1:14-20).

Read it again! "makes both one," "creating the two," "killing the enmity," "every creature," "all created," "in the heaven," "on the earth," "the visible," "the invisible," "all is created," "before all," "all," "in all," "the entire," "to reconcile all," "on the earth," "in the heavens."
How pray tell, are the billion of people that you think are left out of this Scripture are going to burn in Hell Fire for all eternity?
Christ created all and will reconcile all-not only on earth, but also the whole heavenly host!
Do you honesty doubt that Christ "created all?" Do you? How then can you doubt that He will reconcile the same "ALL?" “... in Him is all created ... and through Him to reconcile all to Him ..."(Col. 1:16-20). The phrase "all things" is not in the original Greek Text. It should simply read: "all," not "all things”. It is "faith" that we lack in believing these simple Scriptures!

MORE SCRIPTURAL PROOF FOR THE SALVATION OF ALL
After all of God's punishments and chastisements are meted out, all will be reconciled to God. Death will be abolished (I Cor. 15:26), and all will be vivified and given immortality never to be subject to pain, heartache, or death again. The Scriptures fully substantiate this grand truth.

"For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour; Who will have ALL men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth. For there is One God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus. Who gave Himself a ransom for ALL to be testified in due time" (I Tim. 2:3-4).

"I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw ALL [Gk. "the" all] men unto me" (John 12:32).

"That in the name of Jesus every knee should be bowing, celestial and terrestrial and subterranean, and every tongue should be acclaiming that Jesus Christ is Lord, for the glory of God, the Father" (Phil. 2:10-11).

It wouldn't be "to the glory of God" if it were a forced acclimation. Besides I Cor. 12:3 plainly says, " ... no man can say that Jesus is the Lord, but by the holy spirit." To "acclaim" carries the connotation of a heartfelt, voluntary expression.
"For even as, in Adam, all are dying, thus also, in Christ, shall all be vivified" (I Cor. 15:22).

"Vivified" is from the Greek: Zoopoieo = LIVE-DO, "giving life beyond the reach of death, conferring immortality." The same "all" who are dying in Adam (which includes everyone) is the same "all" that are vivified in Christ (which of necessity includes everyone). Also notice that the "all" are vivified "in" Christ not "out" of Christ, and it's not, "all in Christ are vivified," but rather, "in Christ ... ALL are vivified." The order of words makes a giant difference.

"Consequently, then, as it was through one offense for all mankind for condemnation, thus also it is through one just award for all mankind for life's justifying. For even as, through the disobedience of the one man, the many were constituted sinners, thus also, through the obedience of the One, the many shall be constituted just" (Rom. 5:19).

 This is not a difficult verse to understand. One offense brought condemnation on all mankind and all are constituted sinners. In the same manner ("thus also") through the obedience of the One [Christ] the same "many" are constituted just!

"For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus [sorry, no trinity here-or anywhere] who gave Himself a ransom for ALL to be testified in due time" (I Tim. 2:5-6).

"For in Him [Christ] the entire complement delights to dwell, and through Him to reconcile ALL to Him (making peace through the blood of His cross), through Him, whether those on the earth or those in the heavens" (Col. 1:20).

"If anyone's work shall be burned up, he will forfeit it, yet he shall be saved, yet thus, as through fire" (I Cor. 3:15)

" ... we rely on the living God, Who is the Saviour of ALL mankind, ESPECIALLY [but not exclusively] believers. These things be charging and teaching" (I Tim. 4:10-11).
This verse implies that God saves all, but saves believers in some special sense.

"For God does not dispatch His Son into the world that He should be judging the world, but that the world may be saved through Him" (John 3:17).

" ... God, Who saves us and calls us with a holy calling, not in accord with our acts, but in accord with His own purpose and the grace which is given to us in Christ Jesus before times eonian [before the world began-Authorized]" (II Tim. 1:9).

 Man's salvation was assured before God ever created him. He knew all men would sin. That's why He provided a Saviour. We are being saved by "grace" not by anything we do.

"No one can come to Me if ever the Father Who sends Me should not be drawing him. And I shall be raising him in the last day" (John 6:44).
It is not up to us or anyone to come to Christ. God does the choosing, calling, drawing, etc.


“... the kindness of God is leading you to repentance" (Rom. 2:4).

“... having this same confidence, that He Who undertakes a good work among you, will be performing it until the day of Jesus Christ" (Phil. 1:6).

"Now to Him Who is ABLE to guard you from tripping and to stand you flawless in sight of His glory ...” (Jude 24).

“... if One died for the sake of all, consequently all died" (II Cor. 5:14).

God applies Christ's death and sacrifice to "all men."
"But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels for the suffering of death, crowned with glory and honour; that He by the grace of God should taste death for EVERY man" (Heb. 2:9).

"And he [Christ] is the propitiation for our sins: and not for our sins only, but also for the sins of the WHOLE WORLD" (I John 2:2).
Christ IS the propitiation for the sins of the whole world! How can you doubt it? How can you teach contrary to it? He isn't "potentially" the propitiation for the sins of the world. He IS the propitiation for the sins of the world.

"Yet all is of God, Who conciliates us to Himself through Christ, and is giving us the dispensation of the conciliation, how that God was in Christ, conciliating the world to Himself, not reckoning their offenses to them, and placing in us the word of the conciliation" (II Cor. 5:18-19).

This Scripture is clear. God through Christ's sacrifice (Christ's sacrifice carries a whole lot more weight than you ever give Him credit for) is conciliating the whole world to Himself. Do you know what that means? God is "at peace" with mankind. Yes, there are future chastisements and punishments, but the end result has already been accomplished. What the world must yet go through is for their good. But God already knows the end result. All will be saved! However, only "we" have been given this word of reconciliation (that is any of us "we" who believe it).
Notice that God is "not reckoning their offenses to them." Then who is God "reckoning offenses" to? It is to Jesus Christ His Son that He is reckoning the sins of the world. Vs. 21: "For He [God] hath made Him [Christ] to be SIN for us ... "

Look at this again. This is the Word of God. God is "NOT reckoning their [the whole world] offenses to them" (Vs. 19)! He is not doing that. But He IS making His Son Jesus Christ "to BE sin for us." How could God consign the vast majority of humanity to the eternal flames of torture in Hell if He no longer reckons that they have any sins? Of what value is Christ's sacrifice FOR them if they still have to pay their own penalty for all eternity? This verse is talking about the WHOLE WORLD. The sins of the WHOLE WORLD.
But what if all these sinners of the world reject Christ? Of course most people do reject Christ, but they won't always do so. God has not given them belief yet. Remember "every knee will bow and every tongue will acclaim ... to the Glory of God." Of course most don't will to believe God now, but they all will later.

 " ... for it is GOD Who is operating in you to WILL as well as to work for the sake of His delight" (Phil. 2:13).

"For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the SAVIOUR OF ALL MEN" (I Tim. 4:10).
God is not the "potential" or "possible" saviour of all men. He is the saviour of all men! I believe Him. I think you should too.

Vs. 11"These things command and teach."

"Not one is seeking out God" (Rom. 3:11).

"Now what have you which you did not obtain? Now if you obtained it also, why are you BOASTING as though NOT obtaining?" (I Cor. 4::7).

“Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you ...” (John 15:16).

"No one can come to Me if ever the Father Who sends Me should not be drawing him" (John 6:44).


“He [God] chooses us in Him [Christ] ...” (Eph. 1:4).

"Yea doubtless, and I count all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord: for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and do count them but DUNG, that I may win Christ" (Phil. 3:8), King James Version.

With regards to elders and supervisors in the Church, Paul told Titus:
" ... for the supervisor must be unimpeachable as an administrator of God, not given to self-gratification, not irritable, no toper, not quarrelsome, not avaricious; but hospitable, fond of that which is good, sane, just, benign, self-controlled; upholding the FAITHFUL WORD according to the teaching, that he may be able to entreat with SOUND TEACHING as well as to EXPOSE those who CONTRADICT. For many are insubordinate, vain praters, and imposters ... who must be GAGGED, who are subverting whole households, teaching what they must not, on behalf of sordid gain" (Titus 1:7-11. Concordant Literal New Testament)

I pray that some place in this long letter a little ember of light might have started glowing the reader’s spirit regarding the mountain of Scriptural references I have presented. One loses a lot sometimes when one starts teaching the truths of God, but nothing is more valuable than truth!
There are three great evils of men on earth today: corrupt government, false science, and deceitful religion. Of these, the Christian doctrine of "Eternal Torment" for the majority of God's children is by far the single greatest evil and contemptible teaching ever foisted on the human race anywhere on the face of the earth, in the entire history of the world!
As God wills in the years ahead, the truth concerning this and other Christian doctrines will be made known for all to see. People will finally see this evil teaching for what it is: an anti-Scriptural, anti-God, doctrine of demons, and Satan's greatest effort to blaspheme the very name of God among the nations. And those who teach these evil lies will stand exposed before all!

Now you know the word of GOD has been twisted centuries ago just after the APOSTLES passed out, the word of God gets twisted even the more from the pulpit by our own Prophets, Apostles, Pastors, Teachers, Evangelist and the worse of all is our Theologians. Most of these errors we are encountering have come from Our LATIN brothers (CATHOLICS). Christendom accuse the Catholic’s of false doctrine practices yet we follow their belief, by preaching (eternal torture in hell) and celebrating with them (Christmas and Easter) which the apostles never did- just to mention a few. Some of us still love the Catholic’s though because the catholic’s don’t peddle the word of God, likewise the Jehovah witnesses but our own holy ghost babies and their leaders become one and peddle the word of GOD. Remember Paul said it’s the majority that is peddling the word of GOD, and who are the majority?

2 Corinthians 2:17 "Unlike MANY PEOPLE, we are not in the habit of MAKING PROFIT out of God’s Message" (The Twentieth Century New Testament).
The Majority are not Atheists, not Pagans, not Moslems not Hindus not Sinners but the very Christians that call upon the name of GOD every day. They are the Majority peddling the word of GOD. Only a small number of people are finding the narrow road.

We are not saying that there is no lake of fire, there is...Jesus, Peter and Paul said it is painful to go through this “fire”, so it’s better to go through it now than later, even though there is no partiality with God!!!.
Multitudes no doubt have rejected Jesus and gone into judgment and punishment. But this punishment is not an endless, merciless torment. Rather it is a loving, beneficial, corrective time of purification.

 “The Lord disciplines those he loves, and he punishes everyone he accepts as a son” (Heb 12: 6).

 We read of those who receive the mark of the beast that they
 “will be tormented with fire and sulphur in the presence of the holy angels and of the Lamb” (Rev 14: 10).

This is picture language and both fire and sulphur are cleansing agents. This purging takes place in the loving, caring presence of Jesus. When that work is complete they too will come to repentance and salvation through Jesus Christ and join the great multitude of the redeemed and sing the praises of the saviour of all mankind.
Let’s put on a measure of truth people of God. God should help us to understand this...

GOD’S JUSTICE
God’s justice, as well as his wisdom, his love and his power, make the idea of infinite punishment or eternal torment a total impossibility. Divine justice requires that a lifetime of sin and disobedience and rejection of God should receive a punishment, and no doubt a severe punishment; but every concept of biblical justice demands that it should be limited and not endless.
The picture that now emerges from our study is not a hell of unmitigated, unending torment. Rather it is a place of judgement for correction. We begin to see a loving Creator who is not going to be content with his creatures until they are ultimately purged and cleansed of every sin. He is taking infinite pains over their perfection. His purposes may be long in their outworking, but in the end they will be perfectly accomplished.

Romans 8: 20 - 21: ‘For the creation was subjected to futility, not of its own will, but because of Him who subjected it, in hope that the creation itself also will be set free from its slavery to corruption into the freedom of the glory of the children of God.’


In this passage God clearly takes responsibility for the fall of creation. He subjected the creation to futility in hope of its future deliverance. It was all part of his full creative plan. He did not lose the first round in a conflict with Satan. He positively planned that events should go that way. Think please think well.
Ultimately we must see that God takes responsibility for evil and uses it to bring about his purposes. In Isaiah 45 God states his sovereignty. He states that he has raised up Cyrus, a heathen king, for his purposes. In verse 5 he says, ‘Besides Me there is no God.’ In verse 7 he adds, ‘the one forming light and creating darkness, causing peace and creating evil; I am the Lord who does all these things.’ Some English versions read calamity rather than evil. Good and evil are not two opposing forces, like white and black on the chessboard, striving for mastery of the universe. God created all things including evil to serve his own purposes, and he is in total control.
The prophet Habakkuk wrestled with this problem. Read chapter 1 verses 5 and 6:


‘Look among the nations! Observe! Be astonished! Wonder! Because I am doing something in your days - You would not believe if you were told. For behold, I am raising up the Chaldeans, that fierce and impetuous people ...’ God raised up an evil people to work out his purposes of judgement and correction for Israel. Habakkuk, like us, found it difficult to understand. In Romans 9: 17, Paul quotes Exodus 9: 16 to state emphatically that God raised up Pharaoh. Pharaoh is like Satan, holding the people of God in cruel bondage and captivity until the deliverer comes to set them free. Paul goes on to state the absolute sovereignty of God.

When we start to see Satan and evil and wicked nations as tools in the hand of God for working out his purposes, everything begins to make sense. God plunged the whole creation down into sin that He might bring it up again having known evil and chosen good.
Job in his innocent integrity was certainly pleasing in the eyes of God. God’s work however was not complete. How much greater was Job’s appreciation, love and understanding of God after he had suffered. Like the whole creation, he had to go down before he could rise to a greater height. In Jesus himself above all we see the same pattern. He came down by steps from the greatest height to the lowest depths, before God raised Him again to the highest glory at His right hand.
Do we encourage sinners to continue in their evil ways by taking away the threat of eternal damnation? No! It remains ‘a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God’ (Heb 10: 31). Better we go through the purification now than later. Paul was constrained to be an ‘ambassador for Christ’ not by the fear of hell, but by fear of the Lord and by the love of Christ (2 Cor. 5: 11, 14, 20). We no longer see the human race as hell-bound sinners most of whom will eventually be permanently written off. We see each one as a creation of God for whom He has a purpose that will be accomplished.


DESTROYED, PERISHED, AND LOST
DESTROYED: Is being destroyed a condition from which there is no salvation? Jesus said,
"And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear Him which is able to DESTROY both soul and body in hell [the Greek is "Gehenna" NOT hell. It is ‘Gehenna fire,’ Mat. 5:22, not ‘hell fire’]" (Matt. 10:28)


Is there no salvation from this "destruction" in Gehenna fire? Notice that they are not "eternally lost" in Gehenna fire, but they are "DESTROYED" in gehenna fire. Their condition is that of being DESTROYED. This is not a hopeless condition or even our own Lord would have been put into a hopeless condition.


"Jesus answered and said unto them, DESTROY this temple, and in three days I will raise it up ... but He spake of the temple of His BODY" (John 2:19 & 21).


Later they did destroy Jesus Christ and sure enough three days later God SAVED Jesus from that destruction.
Notice what Job said with relation to being "destroyed":


"Thine hands have made me and fashioned me together round about; yet Thou dost DESTROY me" (Job 10:8).


Yet Job knew that God would yet save him. In Jeremiah 18 God tells Jeremiah to go down to the Potter’s house and observe him at work. Jeremiah sees the potter destroy a marred work in his hand and refashion it into something useful. This we learn is an analogy of how God would "destroy" Judah (Vs. 7), and yet save him in the end. God will refashion all of marred (destroyed) mankind into glorious sons of God!
Jesus told His disciples in a sermon that if they called a brother "fool" they would be in danger of "Gehenna fire." What kind of danger is that? How does this Gehenna fire actually judge us? Is there anywhere that we are told how Gehenna judges us to make us "righteous?" There is a verse that specifically addresses what Gehenna accomplishes, but it is one of the least understood verses in all Scripture:


"And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear Him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell [Gehenna fire]" (Matt. 10:28). 


The biggest problem in understanding this verse, is to understand who this verse is talking about. The Church will tell you that it is talking about those who will suffer loss of salvation in the eternal fires of hell. Yet nothing could be further from the truth. This verse was addressed directly to and about the 12 apostles, and is applied to all Christ's disciples throughout all generations.
Go back to the first verse of chapter 10 for the contextual proof that Jesus is instructing his Apostles only in this teaching: "These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them [no one else, just 'them,' just the twelve apostles], saying..." And Jesus continues speaking unbroken all the way to the eleventh chapter, to His twelve apostles only. Christians always talk about people taking phrases out of context yet they are the worst of all, always looking for phrases to agree with their doctrine.
If it is the world of unrepentant sinners that are to "fear Him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell," then why didn't Jesus make this clear to His apostles in these verses? But no, Jesus warned His apostles that they are to be the ones fearing. Notice:


"...He called unto Himself His twelve disciples... These twelve Jesus sent forth and commanded them saying... [Jesus continues speaking to His apostles only] ...And fear not them [their enemies and persecutors] which kill the body [their body; your body], but are not able to kill the soul [your soul]: but rather fear Him [you twelve apostles] which is able to DESTROY both soul and body [both YOUR soul and YOUR body] in hell [Gehenna fire]" (Matt. 10:1, 5, & 28).


Assuredly, Jesus was not warning the wicked to not fear the wicked who, when they kill the wicked cannot kill the soul... No, this instruction is for believers.
Gehenna is judgment. It is not torture in literal fire. It is judgment upon God's Elect to spiritually purify them; to make them holy and blameless; and to make them strong. Gehenna speaks of judgment, and Jesus taught that God is "able to destroy both soul and body in Gehenna." How are we (God's Elect) presently being destroyed in both body and soul? Notice what Jesus said a few verses after He made this statement:


"He that finds his life [Gk: 'psuche' - soul, not zoe which is life] shall lose it: and he that loses his life [soul] for My sake shall find it" (Matt. 10:39).
King James loves to swap words which are different in meaning just to make a sentence doctrinally sound.
We must be spiritually baptized into Christ's death, and we must also LOSE OUR SOUL for Christ's sake.
Learn to read Scriptures accurately and precisely. Take note that Jesus did NOT say "And fear not them which KILL the body, but are not able to KILL the soul, but rather fear Him which is able to KILL both soul and body in hell [Gk: Gehenna]." No, Jesus did NOT say that, but it is assumed that He either said that or at least meant that. No, He did not. Jesus said: "And fear not them which KILL the body, but are not able to KILL the soul, but rather fear Him which is able to DESTROY both soul and body in hell [Gk: Gehenna]."
Why the switch? Jesus switches from "kill" to "destroy."
It is our "soul" that God is more interested in than our "life." An insane person may have a perfectly healthy life, but his soul is severely damaged. A comatose (coma, tired or drunken state) person may be in perfect physical health and be very much "alive," but possesses virtually no soul-conscious awareness, character, love, emotions, knowledge, hopes and dreams, memories, etc.
Now then, "destroy" in Vs. 28 is the Greek word 'appolumi' and it means: DESTROY, PERISH, LOSE. Wow! Are you seeing this? How much easier it would have been for us if only the translators had been consistent, but God didn't want them to be consistent. Jesus says that God can "appolumi your body and soul." In verse 39 Jesus tells us that we must "appolumi our own soul." Either we 'appolumi' -destroy/lose our souls, or God will 'appolumi' our souls for us, and that is not the way we want to go, seeing that: "It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the Living God" (Heb. 10:31).


And notice this is precisely what we read in Matt. 5:29- "If your right eye offend you [then YOU] pluck it out... And if your right hand offend you [then YOU] cut it off... and not that your whole body should be cast [by GOD, 'fear HIM'] into Gehenna" (Matt. 5:28-30).
We must pluck out and cut off those members of the body which are used to sin against God:
"Mortify therefore your members [Gk: 'melos' -'parts of the BODY' -Dr. Strong] which are upon the earth; fornication, uncleanness, inordinate affection, evil concupiscence, and covetousness, which is idolatry: For which things' sake the wrath of God comes ['fear HIM'] on the children of disobedience: In the which ye also walked some time, when ye lived in them. But now ye also put off all these; anger, wrath, malice, blasphemy, filthy communication out of your mouth. Lie not one to another, seeing that ye have put off the old man with his deeds; And have put on the new man, which is renewed in knowledge after the Image of Him that created him [it]" (Col. 3:5-10).


But hopefully by now, we all know that the different "members" of our body [pluck out your eye; cut off your hand; cut off your foot] do not actually sin, but it is the heart and carnal mind of man that uses the members of his body to commit sin: "Neither yield you your members as instruments of unrighteousness unto sin..." (Rom. 6:13).
So then God teaches us to "fear HIM" and in so doing, DESTROY [Gk: 'apollumi' -destroy, perish, lose] our soul by "PLUCKING OUT AND CUTTING OFF " these members of our body so as to stop using them as "instruments of unrighteousness unto sin" so that God will not have to "destroy both our body and our soul in Gehenna" by "CASTING us into Gehenna." Are you beginning to understand the judgment of "Gehenna fire" (but that won’t be for eternity) and how it works?

PERISHED: Can a person perish and still be saved? Of course. Even "righteous" men can perish,
"All things have I seen in the days of my vanity: there is a JUST MAN that PERISHES in his righteousness, and there is a wicked man that prolongs his life in his wickedness" (Ecc. 7:15).
One more,
"The RIGHTEOUS PERISHES, and no man lays it to heart..." (Isa. 57:1).
Perishing is not something that can cut off God’s arm of salvation.
LOST: Can a person sin, be lost, die, and then be saved? Certainly. Let’s look at one of those parables of Jesus that Christendom thinks of as easy to understand little stories, when in fact they don’t even begin to understand. You all know the story contained in the parable of the Prodigal son so I won’t read it all, but let me give you the "truth" of this parable.
God is the "Father" in this parable, and the Prodigal is EVERY SON WHO HAS GONE ASTRAY.


"And when he had spent all ... And when he came to himself ... I will arise and go to my father ... I have sinned against heaven, and in thy sight ... And am no more worthy to be called thy son ... But the father said to his servants, Bring forth the best robe, and put it on him, and put a ring on his hand, and shoes on his feet. And bring hither the fatted calf ... For this my son was DEAD, and is alive again; he was LOST, and is found. And they began to be merry" (Luke 15:14-23).


This man SINNED, he was LOST, and he SPIRITUALLY DIED! Do we ALL spiritually DIE? "AND AS IT IS APPOINTED UNTO MEN ONCE TO DIE..." But isn’t this speaking of the PHYSICAL death of our bodies? No it is not. The second part of the verse gives us the answer as to which death this is,
"And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but AFTER this the JUDGMENT" (Heb. 9:27).
Notice that "judgment" comes after this death, and not before. We know that JUDGMENT is upon the house of God NOW! Each individual Christian in every generation is judged NOW, in THIS life, BEFORE he physically dies! And so the "death" that all men must partake of before judgment is SPIRITUAL DEATH. Notice:
"And I saw THE DEAD, small and great, STAND before God" (Rev. 20:12).
How pray tell can the physically dead, stand, if they are dead?
So here then is the order of things. The Prodigal Son SINNED, he was LOST, he spiritually DIED, and then? And then he was JUDGED! Where and when was he judged? In the hog pens of a far alien country, that’s where. God had to bring him out of this alien county (Mystery Babylon the Great) with all its "riotous living" (Luke 15:13). And so it was that God JUDGED this Prodigal with the beasts and swine of Babylon until he "came to himself." (Vs. 17).


Seems to me that God sent King Nebuchadnezzar into the fields with the beasts to live like a beast, so that he too "came to himself." God has not warned in vain to "Come out of her [MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH] my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues" (Rev. 17:5 & 18:4).
He that has an ear let him hear.


And so this Prodigal SINNED, was LOST, and spiritually DIED. Surely he is outside of the realm of salvation now. No, he is in the perfect realm FOR SALVATION. How many millions of times this parable of the Prodigal Son has been read, but how many times has its truth ever been understood and perceived? This prodigal was, according to his father, "DEAD." And it was after his father said that he was "dead" that he welcomed him back, forgave him, exalted him, and rewarded him! Now who says one can’t be saved after death. It is after death that most of humanity will be SAVED. Grow up holy ghost babies!
May God finally grant you his spiritual wisdom to SEE SOMETHING SPIRITUAL! Parables are NOT literal, that’s why they are called "parables" instead of "history." Here is the wages of riotous and carnal living in the hog pens of Babylon: "For the wages of sin is DEATH..." (Rom. 6:23). SPIRITUAL DEATH! What must happen AFTER we spiritually DIE? "JUDGMENT!" The spiritual DEAD must be JUDGED. Does judging CORRECT the spiritually dead sinners? Yes it does. That is what the parable of the Prodigal Son is all about. God’s "ways and means" ALWAYS WORK!
"...For when Thy [God’s] JUDGMENTS are in the earth, the INHABITANTS OF THE WORLD WILL LEARN RIGHTEOUSNESS" (Isa. 26:9)

PUNISHING Vs. CHASTENING
I did talk about misused of the word “punishment” earlier on but I want to discuss it properly at this stage. While considering all of the hellfire and brimstone material disseminated by Christian teachers, preachers, writers, and educators around the world, just how many hundreds of times do you suppose the word "punishment" is used in the entire New Testament with regards to sinners? Hundreds? Would you believe less than fifty? Would you believe less than ten? Would you believe ONCE? That’s right, the answer is one time.
"Of how much more punishment [Gk: timoria], suppose you, shall he be thought worthy, who has trodden underfoot the Son of God, and has counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and has done despite unto the Spirit of grace?" (Heb. 10:29).
I can assure you that those who have committed the above crime towards the Lord are few indeed. Most of humanity that will be judged in the lake of fire has NEVER EVEN HEARD of Jesus Christ, let alone, "trodden underfoot the Son of God, and counted the blood of the covenant, an UNHOLY thing, and done DESPITE unto the Spirit of grace." Most have never even heard of such sins, let alone committed them.
This is a most powerful Scripture to be sure, but it does not speak of "eternal" punishment, and it is the ONLY SCRIPTURE IN THE ENTIRETY OF THE NEW TESTAMENT that uses the word "punishment" with reference to punishing sinners!
There are three other places in the KJV that the word "punish" or "punished" is used correctly. They are Acts 4:21; 22:5; and 26:11 where Saul (later Paul) is punishing not sinners, but members of the church, the followers of Christ.
II Thes. 1:9 should be translated, "eonian extermination" and not "punished ... everlasting."
II Peter 2:4 & 9 should both be "chastening" as it is the same Greek word kolazo and not timoria which means punish.
The KJV uses "punished" in verse nine, which should be "chasten," and ironically it doesn’t even translate the Greek word kolazo (chasten) in verse four -- the KJV translators left it out completely. I suppose the translators thought that it was redundant to say, "chastening judging." But then again, they didn’t bother to look at II Cor. 2:6 which should read "rebuke" (another Greek word, epitimia), not "punish."
And lastly, I Pet. 2:14 should read "vengeance" (still another Greek word, kdikesise), and not punishment.
So in the case of "punishment" we have but ONE Scripture to deal with.
Even among those who love the doctrine of eternal torment, no Scripture in the Old Testament has ever been brought forth which even vaguely defends their theory.


PUNISHMENT AND THE GOSPEL
For all those who have never heard the real Gospel of God, here it is:
"How beautiful upon the mountains are the feet of him that brings good tidings, that publish peace; that brings GOOD TIDINGS [that means gospel] of GOOD [not evil tidings of a Lord who administers infinite acts of eternal terrorism], that publishes SALVATION [not DAMNATION] ... The LORD hath made bare His holy arm in the eyes of ALL THE NATIONS [that’s the whole world], and ALL THE ENDS OF THE EARTH [that’s everyone] SHALL SEE THE SALVATION OF OUR GOD" (Isa. 52:7 & 10).


I am wondering if most of my readers have ever even heard of this verse or knew that it is in their Bibles.
Now I am aware of the many Scriptures that speak of death, destruction, and perishing of wicked people. And we won’t forget the one Scripture with regards to punishment. All those Scriptures are true. They are not, however, God’s final judgment on the wicked. The final judgments of God will bring salvation to ALL and there are no scriptures that contradict those saving declarations of Almighty God. God has declared it; He has spoken it; His Word has gone forth: He has willed  
"Who WILL have ALL men to be SAVED and to come unto the knowledge of the truth" (I Tim. 2:4).
Here then is a declaration of God from His own inspired Word. It is found in all Bibles and in all languages on earth for all to see and believe. But the Church of Babylon has tried to destroy this declaration and make it of no effect in the minds of millions and millions of people around the world. They teach that this verse and declaration of Almighty God WILL NEVER EVER HAPPEN! Well, be it known, that they LIE!
Here’s what God says about His own words and His own declarations.


"So shall MY WORD BE that GOES FORTH OUT OF MY MOUTH [as in I Tim. 2:4 and a hundred Scriptures like it]; it shall NOT return unto me void [unfruitful, negated, ineffective, ineffectual, inoperative, invalid, null, worthless, vain, unsuccessful], but it SHALL ACCOMPLISH THAT WHICH I PLEASE, AND IT SHALL PROSPER [bear fruit, benefit, do well, flourish, increase, multiply, progress, make good] in the thing whereto I sent it" (Isaiah 55:11).


Most people don’t know what the preacher teach, they only copy from the tele/radio evangelist and preach the same thing, the fact that BENNY HINN teaches it does not make it right. The fact that the whole world teaches it does not make it right. The narrow gate, only few are finding it not the majority.


Remember the former things of old: For I am God, and there is none else;
I AM GOD, and there is none like Me, "Telling from the BEGINNING, the HEREAFTER, And from AFORETIME, what has NOT YET been done,
Saying, ‘ALL MY COUNSEL SHALL BE CONFIRMED, And ALL MY DESIRE WILL I DO. Calling from the sunrise, a bird of prey,
From a land far off, the man of My counsel. Indeed, I SPEAK! INDEED, I WILL BRING IT ABOUT! I formed. Indeed, I WILL DO IT"
(Isaiah 46:9-11).
Nothing can hinder God’s words or declarations. Even the things that are perceived to be hindrances to God’s will (such as the lake of fire and the second death), are not hindrances at all, but rather are the very instruments for the accomplishment of His will. God has a ONE HUNDRED PERCENT GOSPEL, AND IT’S FREE!

GRACE AND JUDGMENT
"For whom the Lord loves He CHASTENS..." (Heb. 12:6).
There is no escaping it. If you are to be a "son of God" you will be chastened. The word "chastened" is paideuo, and is not too severe. Even if involving some punishment, the whole thrust of the word is to train, educate, discipline, prune, instruct, etc. These are all good things not to be feared. But there is more, so we might just as well read it and get our attitudes adjusted to it. The rest of the verse:
"For whom the Lord loves He CHASTENS, and [AND] ...SCOURGES every son whom He receives [or is assenting]" (Heb. 12:6)
"SCOURGES?" No, not scourging! Does God show His love toward us by scourging us? It is absolutely necessary. Scourging is definitely even more severe and harsh than chastening.
The word "scourge" in Heb. 12:6 is from the Greek word mastigoo and here’s its definition: "to flog (literally or figuratively) -- scourge" Strong’s Greek Dictionary, page 46. And what does "flog" mean?
"flog 1. To beat severely with a whip or rod." Page 531 American heritage College Dictionary.
This word "scourge" in Heb. 12:6 which God performs on us, is the very same word found in John 19:1 where it says they took Jesus and "scourged" Him. Now then, will God literally "BEAT SEVERELY WITH A WHIP OR ROD" every son that He receives? No, not necessarily, even though they did literally do so to Paul and many other followers of Jesus Christ. Remember that the definition said it can be "literal OR figurative."
Many people have come to know Christ in their senior years, and God does not literally beat every little old lady with whips and rods when they turn to Him. However, the chastening of God’s grace in Titus 2:11 can certainly seem like a real flogging. God will chasten us until He drives out the beast in us. Although we are not condemned when God judges us, we nonetheless must be chastened.


"If you endure chastening, God deals with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chastens not? But if you be without chastisement, whereof ALL are partakers, then are you bastards, and NOT sons. Furthermore we have had fathers of our flesh which corrected us, and we gave them reverence: shall we not much rather be in subjection into the Father of spirits, and live? For they verily for a few days chastened us after their own pleasure; but He for OUR PROFIT, that we might be partakers of His holiness. Now no chastening for the present seems to be joyous, but GRIEVOUS: nevertheless afterward it yields the PEACEABLE FRUIT OF RIGHTEOUSNESS unto them which are exercised thereby" (Heb. 12:7--11).


So it is essential that we accept God’s chastisement which is how He "judges" us.
The reason we are not "condemned" with the world is because we accept God’s judgment in our lives
"There is therefore now NO CONDEMNATION to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit" (Rom. 8:1).
But can we compare the judging that believers go through with the judging that the wicked receive at the end of the age in the lake of fire. Surely there is no comparison, is there? Trust me when I say, "For there is no respect [Gk: partiality] of persons with God" (Rom. 2:11).
·         Doesn’t the "second death" part of the "lake of fire" seal their fate forever?
·         Isn’t it true that God will never, ever pressure anyone to accept Jesus Christ?
·         Isn’t it true that even God Himself doesn’t know why some people reject His Sacrifice?
·         Didn’t God predestine us to be saved but predestined those in the lake of fire to be damned?
·         Isn’t the reason why some people choose Christ and others Reject Christ an eternal mystery?
·         Is there something about death itself that prevents God from saving a non-believer after death?
·         Does Rom. 8:38-19 substantiate the teaching that death separates God from sinners, eternally?
·         Isn’t the lake of fire the most dreadful thing that God Almighty has ever created?
·         Will billions of sinners purposely choose to be tortured in fire forever rather than accept Christ?
·         Let’s face it, isn’t the lake of fire something we will never understand until it comes?
·         Is God as stupid and depraved as the theologians who try to bring Him down to their level?
I will now answer all these questions in order: No, No, No, No, No, No, No, No, No, No, and NO!


Keep these scriptures in mind.
"And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast [what is THAT?], and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone [does brimstone make the lake of fire burn HOTTER? Is fire without brimstone not hot enough to burn and torture human flesh?]" (Rev. 19:20).
"And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire [I thought a lake contains water] and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented [does that mean TORTURED? Can spirit beings be tormented by physical fire?] day and night [but there shall be ‘NO NIGHT’, 20:25] for ever and ever [how long is THAT? Is ‘ever AND ever’ something like TWICE as long as eternity?]" (Rev. 20:10).
"And I saw a great white [not BLACK] throne, and Him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away [where did they GO?]; and there was found no place for them [if this is literal, then where did God PUT THEM?]" (Rev. 20:11).
"And I saw the dead, small and great, stand [stand WHERE, both the heavens AND THE EARTH ‘fled away’ Vs. 11] before God; and the books [are these books like a daily DIARY from Waterston Bookstore?] Were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life [why is this only ONE book?]: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works" (Rev. 20:12).
"And the sea gave up the dead which were in it [is this speaking of dead sailors who drowned in the ocean?]; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them [is death and hell a place or a realm? And how can HELL deliver up their DEAD -- we are assured by Christendom that those in hell are VERY MUCH ALIVE and SUFFERING?]: and the dead were judged [does judge mean SENTENCED TO HELL FOR EVER?] every man according to their works" (Rev. 20:13).
"And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire [wait just a minute; Christendom tells us that death {separation from God} and hell represent what the lake of fire actually IS, so how pray tell can they be cast INTO the lake of fire?]. This is the second death [Ah, here is the real key to understand this whole enigma - -the SECOND death is not a repeat performance of the FIRST death]" (Rev. 20:14).
"And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire [where they are BURNED UP? TORTURED FOR ETERNITY? Or JUDGED -- - RIGHT?]" (Rev. 20:15).
"But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake of fire which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death" (Rev. 21:8).


One can check a hundred translations of the Bible, and there will be little deviation from the verses cited above. The King James Version is about as accurate a translation of these verses as there is. Most versions are very close to the KJV, word for word. But there are about a dozen Bible Translations that differ most significantly on five little words. The most heretical and damning doctrines of Christendom completely melt away with a proper translation of these five little words: eis tous [for the] aionas ton [of the] aionon. So we have "for the (something?) Of the (something?)."
Now that we know what the olam , aion and the aionon is, we should understand all verses and scriptures that uses eternity, evermore, ever and ever, and everlasting. All we have to do is to replace them with the proper word and have a proper translation and that takes away the contradiction of scriptures we listed from the beginning of this letter.
Now we learned from Scripture that if we would volunteer to have God judge us now that we would not need to be condemned with the world in the lake of fire. And Peter tells us that this judgment (like the one the Thessalonians were going through) must begin at the HOUSE OF GOD. We saw that it involves much tribulation, sorrow, affliction and suffering. These things are God’s judgment on believers to try their hearts and prove them worthy for the Kingdom of God. Christ told us that if we do not forsake all (even give our very bodies as a living Sacrifice, according to Paul) and take up OUR cross and follow Christ into persecutions that start in our own household, then He doesn’t want us in the kingdom with Him -- we are NOT WORTHY (at this time)!


Now if you are following these Scriptures closely you will see that we are to give our bodies as a living sacrifice and endure suffering, affliction, and persecution. But there is MORE! Oh NO, how much more can we take? What else? TRIALS. There are trials! The word "trial" in the New Testament is translated from the Greek word dokimion and means TESTING. God is going to TEST us. Are you excited about that? However, We must go through it. Peter tells us the many trials and temptations are heaviness to our hearts, but because we know why we are going through it, we can, nevertheless, REJOICE!
"Wherein ye GREATLY REJOICE, though now for a season, if need be, ye are in HEAVINESS THROUGH MANIFOLD TEMPTATIONS" (I Peter 1:6).
Ah, yes, how sweet it is in the mouth (REJOICE), but how bitter it is in the belly (HEAVINESS) (Rev. 10:10). But say, did you notice how LONG these trials last? For eternity? Or for "a season"? Remember there is NO partiality with God. As we have studied earlier on, those in the final judgment of lake of fire will also be there for just "a season" not eternally!
God should help us to understand...

PART 2
GEHENNA FIRE IS JUDGMENT FIRE ON ALL GOD'S ELECT
"If you be reproached [insulted] for the name of Christ, happy are you... yet if any man suffer as a Christian, let him not be ashamed; but let him glorify God on this behalf, for the time is come that judgment must begin at the house of God..." (I Pet. 4:14, 16-17). 


We must all receive reproaches from men, but judgment from God. And God purges us from the offenses of our carnal mind by "His Divine consuming FIRE" (Heb. 12:29).
The word "fire" is used with reference to Judgment many times in Scripture: "Gehenna fire," "salted with fire," "furnace of fire," "unquenchable fire," "everlasting fire," "burn by fire," "baptism by fire," "coals of fire," "flaming fire," "eternal fire," "consuming fire."


Are all of these Scriptural uses of fire really literal, physical, descriptions of how God will torture most of humanity as depicted in this Medieval Christian Art?
Here are the New Testament Scriptures which speak of different "fires" by which men are judged:
"That the trial of your faith, being much more precious than of Gold that perishes, though it be tried in the fire [Christ's 'Gehenna fire'], might be found unto praise and honour and glory at the appearing of Jesus Christ" (I Pet. 1:7)
"Faith" is intangible and as such cannot be "tried" in literal fire. The Greek word translated fire is pur, and it means "fire" (literal or figuratively)-Strong's #4442
.
Every man's work shall be made manifest: for the day shall declare it, because it shall be revealed by FIRE; and the FIRE shall try every man's work of what sort it is. If any man's work abide which he has built there upon, he shall receive a reward. If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved, yet as BY FIRE" (I Cor. 3:13-15).


Again fire (Gk; pur) is used figuratively, because the one being tried, "...he himself shall be saved, yet as BY FIRE." If one is "saved by fire," he is not eternally tortured in fire. Come on people wake up from your long slumber!
"I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance: but He [Jesus] that comes after me is mightier than I, Whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: He shall baptize you with the Holy Spirit [that's good], and with fire [that's also good]" (Matt. 3:11).


Here, being baptized (immersed) in fire [pur] is as important and beneficial as being baptized with God's Holy Spirit.
"Whose fan is in His hand, and He will thoroughly purge His [threshing] floor, and gather His wheat [wheat is good] into the garner, but He will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire" (Matt. 3:12).


Chaff is the bracts enclosing the good, mature wheat, which is removed during threshing-it has no value as food, and so is burned like the wood, hay, and stubble of I Cor. 3:12. The Elect are composed of both the valuable wheat and the worthless chaff, but we are not the tares. Notice that the chaff is "burned up... with unquenchable fire." If this "unquenchable fire" "burns up" the chaff, surely it cannot be eternal. Unquenchable has nothing to do with eternal. Unquenchable fires are Scriptures that are not allowed to be quenched before they are allowed to burn themselves out.
Winnowing Wheat

"He will gather His wheat... but He will burn up the chaff" (Matt. 3:12).
We are the wheat of Jesus' parable, and we have unwanted chaff surrounding our lives. Jesus is not likening some people to wheat and others to chaff. The wheat is not one group and the chaff another, but rather the unwanted chaff belongs to the desired wheat. The wheat is the baby and the chaff is the bath water. We do not throw away the baby with the bath water, but we do throw away the dirty bath water (in this analogy the bath water represents chaff which is burned in fire).
"For every one shall be salted with fire and every sacrifice shall be salted with salt" (Mark 9:49, See Rom. 12:1-we are that sacrifice).


Fire purifies and burns up unwanted character traits likened to "straw, hay, and stubble" and also to "chaff." But Salt is a preservative. Hence the salt and the fire. The spiritual fire purifies us and the spiritual salt preserves us.
"And He said unto His disciples... I am come to send fire on the earth: and what will I, if it be already kindled [in His disciples, generation by generation, in this church age, NOW]?" (Luke 12:22 & 49)


How can anyone suggest that the different "fires" of which Jesus speaks are literal? What LITERAL FIRE did Jesus set back in Palestine during His ministry? Did He burn down some town or city? Did He start a forest fire. Well, He said the fire sent on the earth was "already kindled" during this period of His ministry. When will the Church give up this literal nonsense concerning the spiritual fire of God's spirit with which he will purify all humanity beginning with His Own House?
"It is the spirit that quickens [gives life] the flesh [letter] profits nothing: the WORDS [wheat, chaff, tares, seed, fish, leaven, light, salt, rock, sand, wine, treasure, sons, harvest, Samaritan, physician, sheep, pearl, servants, trees, virgins, talents, vineyards, wedding, supper, coin, talents] are SPIRIT and they are LIFE" (John 6:63). 
And here is the second witness to this Scriptural truth: 


"Who also has made us able ministers of the New Covenant; not of the letter [flesh or written code], but of the spirit for the letter [written code] kills, but the spirit gives life" (II Cor. 3:6).
Now understand that when Jesus says His words are spirit, He is not saying that each individual phonetically sounded syllable is literally spirit, but the meaning and understanding of His STATEMENTS are spirit. Just a few verses earlier Jesus made a statement that prompted His declaration that "the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit."
Here is what He said: 


"For my flesh is meat [food/bread] indeed; and my blood is drink indeed. He that eats My flesh, and drinks My blood, dwells in Me, and I in him" (John 6:55-56). 
The words meat and blood are no more "spirit" than is the word poison. But when used to represent "Jesus," Jesus being the bread from heaven, THEN it becomes spirit. Jesus is (spirit) bread that will ultimately impart immortality to those who (spiritually) eat it.
So when the Scriptures tell us, "For our God is a consuming fire" (Heb. 12:29), can't we understand that these words are "spirit?" God is SPIRIT..." (John 4:24). "...the INVISIBLE God..." (Col. 1:15). Now how can God be visible fire, when we are plainly told and shown in many Scriptures that God is invisible spirit? This phrase, "For our God is a consuming fire," is not literal, so as to contradict the rest of Scripture, but rather is a spiritual statement-the words are literal words, but the statement, the declaration, is spirit. God, as invisible Spirit, spiritually burns up the spiritual wood, hay, straw, and carnality of the human heart, in a similar way that literal fire burns up these physical materials.
All these "fires" are the same Fire: GOD IS THIS CONSUMING FIRE!
Jesus' judgments are upon His disciples, in this Church age, not upon the wicked and non-believers of the world. Their time is coming, but not in this age.


CHRIST'S JUDGMENTS ARE UPON US, NOT THE WORLD
The Church would have us believe that the world and all of its wicked people who have passed on are being judged today, and every day. That as people live and die, if they are not "saved," they are immediately judged and go to hell. Isn't that what they teach? You know that is what they teach. its Bogus and Nonsense!
Is Saddam Hussein, right now, in Hell? Ask your Pastor; ask your teacher; ask your preacher; ask your priest? If anyone is burning in Hell right now, then that person has already been judged. It was in the Egyptian hell of Amenti where the dead were judged at death, not some future "day of judgment." And so Christendom has rejected the Word of God for the pagan customs of the Egyptians. Ask you Pastors why God "has appointed A DAY IN THE WHICH He will judge the world in righteousness" (Acts 17:31) if the dead are judged immediately upon death just as taught by the pagan Egyptians? 


"Because He has appointed a day, in the which He will [even in Paul's day it was still a future time] judge the world in righteousness by that Man Whom He has ordained: whereof He has given assurance unto all men, in that He has raised Him from the dead" (Acts 17:31).


This is Paul teaching the Athenians [pagan Greeks] that there is yet coming a day of judgment on this world. Did it already come many years after Christ's resurrection when Paul was teaching these Greeks? NO. Does anyone have a problem with the phrase, "in the which He WILL [future tense] judge the world?" Two thousand years later that appointed day has not yet arrived. But there is another judgment which did arrive two thousand years ago:
God will help us to understand.
"Eonian life" is life for the eons or life for the ages. However long the eons or ages are, that is how long eonian or age-abiding life is. Then what?

Here's why unlearned theologians say this is not possible, because after the ages or eons, we would all die. NOT TRUE!

Let me illustrate. Suppose your company is going to buy you and everyone in your company an all-expense paid trip to Europe for one month.  EVERYBODY gets that trip. However, because you are such a fabulous worker and such a asset to the company, your boss is going to send you on a trip to Europe for three whole weeks BEFORE everyone else goes on their trip. This is a SPECIAL, BONUS trip. Not many get to go on THIS particular bonus trip, only a few.

Now then, you get to go THREE WEEKS earlier than the rest. When they arrive, you have already been there enjoying yourself for THREE WEEKS. So when the others arrive to begin their vacation, does your vacation END? No. Only your "three week" vacation ends. But you CONTINUE to vacation in Europe just as long as the rest. Your hotel reservation is not cancelled after three weeks.

That is not a perfect illustration, but maybe you get the point.
"Aionion" or "Age-lasting life" is a SPECIAL gift from God that only a relatively FEW ever receive. It is LIFE in God's Kingdom BEFORE the masses are brought into God's Kingdom. What allows those who are given "eonian life" to continue living even AFTER the eons are past, is not the promise from God of "eternal life" but rather "immortality."

All of God's children will be given
immortality and incorruption, so that they will never die. However, those who are given immortality before the rest, receive it ages or eons in advance of the rest.

Because of fraudulent theologians time has become eternity.

THE EONS END, INDIVIDUALLY AND COLLECTIVELY
Heb.9:26
conclusion of the eons
KJV has: the end of the world
1Cor.10:11
consummations of the eons
KJV has: the ends of the world
Matt.24:3
conclusion of the eon
KJV has: the end of the world
It is possible that your Bible does not use the word "eon" or "age" for the Greek word “aion.” It may use “world.” I realize this gets confusing but God is not the author of confusion. Man is.
Here is Hebrews 9:26 from some very well respected Bibles:
Hebrews 9:26: (since it was necessary for him often to have suffered from a laying down of a world;)now but once for all at an end of the ages, for a removal of sin by means of the sacrifice of himself he has been manifested. (Diaglott)

Hebrews 9:26: Else had it been needful for him, ofttimes, to suffer, from the foundation of the world; but, now, once for all, upon a conjunction of the ages, for a setting aside of sin through means of his sacrifice, hath he been made manifest; (Rotherham)

Hebrews 9:26: For then he ought to have suffered often from the beginning of the world: but now once at the end of ages, he hath appeared for the destruction of sin, by the sacrifice of himself.
(Darby)

Hebrews 9:26: or else he must have suffered often since the foundation of the world. But now once at the end of the ages, he has been revealed to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself.
(HNV)

Hebrews 9:26: for then he must have often sufferance since the foundation of the world: but now, once, at the conclusion of the ages, he has been manifested to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself.
(LO)

Hebrews 9:26: or else he must have suffered often since the foundation of the world. But now once at the end of the ages, he has been revealed to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself.
(WEB)

Hebrews 9:26: In that case Christ would have needed to suffer many times, from the creation of the world onwards; but as a matter of fact He has appeared once for all, at the Close of the Ages, in order to do away with sin by the sacrifice of Himself.
(Weymouth)

Hebrews 9:26: since it had behoved him many times to suffer from the foundation of the world, but now once, at the full end of the ages, for putting away of sin through his sacrifice, he hath been manifested;
(YLT)

Hebrews 9:26: since then He must often be suffering from the disruption of the world, yet now, once at the conclusion of the eons, for the repudiation of sin through His sacrifice, is He manifest
(Concordant Literal New Testament).
So we see that sin will be repudiated or put away when all the eons otherwise called "ages" come to an end.
Please note that the KJV mistranslated this verse like this:
CLICK ON IMAGE TO ENLARGE
Do you see the mistake? Where they translated "end of the world" the word “world” was translated as if it were singular in the KJV but the Greek word is plural for “aeons.” Not only is that but the Greek word for “world” really “kosmos.” The KJV translated kosmos correctly in the first part of the verse as “world” but in the second part they translated the plural aiwnwn (eons) as “world” also! Now do you see why people are so confused on this issue of the eons/ages ending? If the Bible was a radio and the translators were electricians, their radio would never work because it would have short circuited long long ago! NONSENSE! “Nkwaseasem”!


1Corinthians 10:11 is another verse which shows that the eons end:
1 Corinthians 10:11: These things and all types happened to them; was written and for admonition of us, on whom the ends of the ages met. (Diaglott)

1 Corinthians 10:11: These things happened to them by way of warning, and were recorded to serve as a caution to us, in whose days the close of the ages has come.
(Twenty)

1 Corinthians 10:11: But, these things, by way of type, were happening unto them, and were written with a view to our admonition, unto whom, the ends of the ages, have reached along.
(Rotherham)

1 Corinthians 10:11: Now these things happened unto them by way of example; and they were written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the ages are come.
(ASV)

1 Corinthians 10:11: Now all these things happened to them as types, and have been written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the ages are come.
(Darby)

1 Corinthians 10:11: Now all these things happened to them by way of example, and they were written for our admonition, on whom the ends of the ages have come.
(HNV)
CLICK ON IMAGE TO ENLARGE
Notice again how the KJV translators messed up? The Greek word "Kosmos" does not appear anywhere in 1 Corinthians 10:11. Therefore the word “world” should not appear either. The Greek word that IS in 1 Corinthians 10:11 is aiwnwn is the plural form of "aiwn" and should be "eons" or "ages." It should not be translated as “ends of the world” but “ends of the eons or ages.”

1 Corinthians 10:11: Now, all these things happened to them as types; and are written for our admonition, on whom the ends of the ages are come.
(LO)

1 Corinthians 10:11: Now all these things happened to them by way of example, and they were written for our admonition, on whom the ends of the ages have come.
(WEB)

1 Corinthians 10:11: All this kept happening to them with a figurative meaning; but it was put on record by way of admonition to us upon whom the ends of the Ages have come.
(Weymouth)

1 Corinthians 10:11: And all these things as types did happen to those persons, and they were written for our admonition, to whom the end of the ages did come,
(Young Literal Translation)

1Corinthians 10:11: Now all this befalls them typically. Yet it was written for our admonition, to whom the consummations of the eons have attained
(Concordant Literal Translation)

The eons will end. When the eons end, God’s goal is to “vivify” or give immortality to all mankind, subject all mankind to Christ and be All in all mankind (1 Cor.15:22-28), and have all in the heavens and on the earth reconciled to Him (Col.1:20), and have all in the heavens and all on the earth headed up in the Christ (Eph.1:10), and justify all mankind (Romans 5:18), and make all mankind righteous (Romans 5:19). These things have already attained to the believer so in essence the consummations of the eons have attained to us per 1 Corinthians 10:11.
So since the eons do in fact end, and since the Greek word aiwnwn or "eonian" is that which pertains to the eons, then we know that eonian cannot have the meaning of “eternal.” The only way “eonian” could have the meaning of “eternal” would be if the word “eon” meant eternal. Since no eon is eternal then that which is eonian cannot be pertaining to that which is eternal.
 Since no eon can be eternal (since they all end) this proves that there is no such thing as "eternal torment" and proves that all that God longs for in His goals for mankind will be met!
    
Aiwnwn is the same as aionion = aeons/eons
Aiwn is the same as aion = eon/aeon

 

May God grant us the wisdom and knowledge to understand ALL.


2 comments:

  1. THATS AN EXCELLENT RESEARCH WORK..KEEP IT UP MAN OF GOD...YOU ARE ON THE RIGHT TRACK.

    ReplyDelete
  2. My name is Alan Finch. I became a Christian 42 years ago.

    The “Mercy Seat” which was among the Children of Israel in the Old Testament was the most important object in the Tabernacle. The “Mercy Seat” was a representation of the Throne of God in Heaven. The Great White Throne in Heaven (i.e. – Throne of Mercy) will be the very Throne that God will be seated on when He executes judgment on ALL those who come before Him at the future Great White Throne Judgment.

    The future Great White Throne Judgment which has been misunderstood by today’s Church will be the judgment of God executing His “GREAT MERCY” of RECONCILING to Himself each and every person who comes before the future Great White Throne Judgment. (Note: This is why that the “Seat” of God is named the “Mercy Seat.”

    This will be done through the transforming work by FIRE from God’s Spirit for the purpose of a “Divine Spiritual Transformation.” This has only been made possible because of what Christ accomplished on the Cross by the shedding of His Redeeming Blood for ALL. (Note: The Scriptures do not reveal the length of time for this transforming work of God in each individual. Very likely the length of time will vary with each individual)

    Colossians 1:20 - “Christ, who predetermined by God, bled peace into the world by His death on the Cross as God’s means of reconciling to Himself the whole creation, ALL things in heaven and ALL things on earth.”
    The future Great White Throne Judgment will not be a judgment of people spending eternity being tormented in a physical Lake of Fire which has become the popular present-day traditional teaching of the Church.

    I have written a 28 page article which Biblically expounds upon the final destiny of the entire human race which is made up of those without Christ, those who are Believers in Christ who will be found to have been faithful servants of the Lord, and those who are Believers in Christ who will be found not to have been faithful servants of the Lord. If anyone would like a copy of the article, feel free to e-mail me and request a copy, and I will send you a copy.

    (candy33alan@aol.com)

    ReplyDelete

Popular Posts

EVIL IN THE BOSOM OF BENNY HINN